<p>Scholars Valerie Bostwick (Kansas State University) and Bruce Weinberg (The Ohio State University) recently published a study measuring the effects of year-to-year variations in Ph.D. student cohort gender composition on persistence and degree completion. Their research utilizes AARC faculty rosters across Ohio-based STEM Ph.D. programs at public universities. The paper was published in the <a href="https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/jole/current">Journal of Labor Economics</a> (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/714921">10.1086/714921</a>); supplementary material in the form of a data file is also available (<a href="https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/suppl/10.1086/714921">https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/suppl/10.1086/714921</a>).</p>
<p><strong>The Study in Context</strong></p>
<p>While qualitative reports have highlighted the effects of a ‘female-unfriendly climate’ on students (Settles et al., 2016), this study quantified the effect of cohort gender composition within these programs. By estimating the effect of gender composition on persistence and on-time graduation rates, Bostwick and Weinberg sought to expand on the understanding of the gender seniority gap (where women struggle to progress at each step from junior to senior roles due to successive structural barriers). Also measured were the relationships between cohort gender composition and the likelihood of receiving research funding.</p>
<p>Ph.D. students were chosen due to their relatively high dropout rates (30% within six years of enrolment) and because they are likely to be highly committed to a career in STEM, differentiating them from undergraduates. In undertaking longitudinal observation at each institution and comparing these differences internally, this enabled the researchers to better control for inter-institutional variables (i.e., year-to-year fluctuations in cohort gender-composition at the same-course at the same institution are likely to be dictated to some extent by external factors). The average cohort consisted of 38% women.</p>
<p><strong>Summary of Results</strong></p>
<p>Women were 11.7% less likely to graduate on-time in comparison to their male peers in cohorts with no female peers, but a 1.0 standard deviation increase in the proportion of female students (a mean of around 21% in this study) increased the likelihood of on-time graduation for women relative to men by 4.4%. This effect is felt predominantly within the first year of a Ph.D., which is primarily during the coursework section of a doctorate program.</p>
<p>In typically male programs such as Math, Engineering, and Physics this effect is even greater: in cohorts no female peers, women were 18% less-likely than men to graduate on-time. Also of note is that male Ph.D. students were more likely to be funded in each year of the first four years of study. The effect of more female students on graduation time for men is negative but statistically insignificant.</p>
<p><strong>Explaining Differences in Gender Persistence</strong></p>
<p>Bostwick and Weinberg put forward several potential explanations for these differences which they go on to test. These are: ‘intangible effects on the climate surrounding the students’, improvements in the likelihood of women receiving research grants in cohorts which are more female, improved performance in first-year classes with a greater proportion of women, faculty gender composition and greater mentoring opportunities from the cohort above.</p>
<p>When controlling for these variables, the effect of gender-composition on GPA was found to be small (around a quarter of the total difference as an upper-bound) and there was no effect of gender composition on research-funding or mentoring. Faculty gender composition was also not found to have any effect on persistence.</p>
<p>Their results are most consistent with a climate-based mechanism, where a greater-number of women generates a more welcoming environment for women, which in turn encourages persistence among female peers.</p>
<p><strong>Recommendations</strong></p>
<p>Where there is an absence of university-specific studies on peer cohort gender-composition, this new study contributes to a growing body of literature across different institutional settings, which find that increasing the number of women increases the retention and success of other women (e.g., Huntington-Klein &amp; Rose, 2018). Previous studies (e.g., Hill, 2017) found that women were less likely to choose programs and even universities with male-dominated cohorts, indicating that mostly-male cohorts act as a barrier both pre- and post-entry. Bostwick and Weinberg go on to suggest that ‘peer gender composition may be a useful proxy for climate.’</p>
<p>With this in mind, we believe that university faculties should consider monitoring the year-to-year gender composition of cohorts in STEM doctorate programs closely, providing additional support where necessary to women in male-dominated programs. This could include inter-disciplinary support groups for women Ph.D. students in STEM subjects and greater staff-support. Similarly, we believe this is indicative of a wider need to change attitudes and behaviors among students and faculty members regarding women in STEM, offering a more comprehensive range of gender-sensitivity and bias training. Furthermore, the difference in research funding between male and female students is an area where future research may prove rewarding.</p>
<p><strong>References</strong></p>
<p>Bostwick, V. K., &amp; Weinberg, B. A. (2022). Nevertheless She Persisted? Gender Peer Effects in Doctoral STEM Programs. Journal of Labor Economics, 000–000. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/714921">https://doi.org/10.1086/714921</a></p>
<p>Hill, Andrew J. 2017. The positive influence of female college students on their male peers. Labour Economics 44:151–60. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LABECO.2017.01.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LABECO.2017.01.005</a>.</p>
<p>Huntington-Klein, N., &amp; Rose, E. (2018) Gender peer effects in a predominantly male environment: Evidence from West Point. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 108:1–4. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181114">https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181114</a></p>
<p>Settles, I.H., O’Connor, R.C., &amp; Yap, S.C.Y. (2016) Climate Perceptions and Identity Interference Among Undergraduate Women in STEM: The Protective Role of Gender Identity. Psychology of Women Quarterly. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0361684316655806">https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0361684316655806</a></p>


The Effects of Cohort Gender Composition on Doctorate Completion

<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-12720 alignleft" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/WriterStockImage-300x213.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="213" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/WriterStockImage-200x142.jpg 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/WriterStockImage-300x214.jpg 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/WriterStockImage-400x284.jpg 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/WriterStockImage-600x426.jpg 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/WriterStockImage-768x545.jpg 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/WriterStockImage-800x568.jpg 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/WriterStockImage.jpg 840w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />Academic Analytics Research Center (AARC) is looking for a freelance writer to summarize scholarly journal articles about scientometrics and higher education for a highly educated audience of non-specialists. We are looking for someone who can distill selected articles into news briefs, blog posts, and announcements for audiences that include senior university administrators, research faculty, and the wider audience of the AARC community.</p>
<p>If you are interested, please let us know by emailing <a href="mailto:contactus@aarcresearch.com">contactus@aarcresearch.com</a> with a resume and three writing samples. If it’s not right for you, feel free to pass this to others who may be a good fit.</p>


Freelance Writer Opportunity

<p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-022-01288-9"><img class="alignleft wp-image-12717 size-medium" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Pay-Transparency-and-Pay-Inequity-300x155.png" alt="" width="300" height="155" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Pay-Transparency-and-Pay-Inequity-200x103.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Pay-Transparency-and-Pay-Inequity-300x155.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Pay-Transparency-and-Pay-Inequity-400x207.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Pay-Transparency-and-Pay-Inequity-600x310.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Pay-Transparency-and-Pay-Inequity-768x397.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Pay-Transparency-and-Pay-Inequity-800x414.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Pay-Transparency-and-Pay-Inequity-1024x530.png 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Pay-Transparency-and-Pay-Inequity-1200x621.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Pay-Transparency-and-Pay-Inequity.png 1247w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a>Scholars Tomasz Obloj (HEC Paris) and Todd Zenger (University of Utah) recently published a study of pay transparency in the US academic workplace. The paper was published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/nathumbehav/">Nature Human Behaviour</a> (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01288-9">10.1038/s41562-022-01288-9</a>) and the authors also publicly deposited their data and code (<a href="https://doi.org/10.3886/E155541V1">10.3886/E155541V1</a>).</p>
<p>The study merged salary information obtained via FOIA requests to faculty rosters and productivity metrics provided by Academic Analytics. The study explored whether “staggered shocks” (the time when salary information was made publicly available online) had a relationship with pay equity. The authors found that pay transparency resulted in greater pay equity (“the fairness and consistency with which an institution or department allocates pay to individuals”) and pay equality (“the equivalence of pay,” e.g. between men and women). Interestingly, “pay for performance” (e.g., performance-based salary) show the opposite pattern; in the author’s words, “Pay transparency prompts those allocating pay to weaken the link between observable performance metrics and pay” and “the financial rewards linked to observable performance metrics as well as rank advancement substantially decline after wages become more transparent.”</p>
<p>This important study has clear implications for higher education administrative leaders responsible for salary and merit increases. Pay transparency has long been discussed as a means to address pay inequality, and this study demonstrates that transparency does push the needle towards that goal, but also acts to partially decouple the relationship between performance and pay.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>References</p>
<p>Obloj, T., Zenger, T. The influence of pay transparency on (gender) inequity, inequality and the performance basis of pay. <em>Nat Hum Behav</em> (2022). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01288-9">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01288-9</a></p>


Pay Transparency and Pay Inequity

<div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-1 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0);background-position: center center;background-repeat: no-repeat;border-width: 0px 0px 0px 0px;border-color:#e2e2e2;border-style:solid;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start" style="max-width:1248px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-0 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column" style="background-position:left top;background-repeat:no-repeat;-webkit-background-size:cover;-moz-background-size:cover;-o-background-size:cover;background-size:cover;padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;"><div class="fusion-video fusion-youtube" style="max-width:600px;max-height:360px;align-self:center; width:100%"><div class="video-shortcode"><iframe title="YouTube video player 1" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hRyOLfL1QxA?wmode=transparent&autoplay=0" width="600" height="360" allowfullscreen allow="autoplay; fullscreen"></iframe></div></div><div class="fusion-section-separator section-separator triangle fusion-section-separator-1" style="margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:30px;"><div class="fusion-section-separator-svg" style="border-bottom:1px solid #e2e2e2;"><div class="divider-candy-arrow bottom" style="top:0px;border-top-color: #f9f9fb;"></div><div class="divider-candy bottom" style="bottom:-21px;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e2e2;border-left:1px solid #e2e2e2;"></div></div><div class="fusion-section-separator-spacer"><div class="fusion-section-separator-spacer-height" style="height:1px;"></div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-section-separator-1 .fusion-section-separator-svg {margin-left:1.92%;margin-right:1.92%;}@media only screen and (max-width:1024px) {.fusion-section-separator-1 .fusion-section-separator-svg {margin-left:1.92%;margin-right:1.92%;}}@media only screen and (max-width:640px) {.fusion-section-separator-1 .fusion-section-separator-svg {margin-left:1.92%;margin-right:1.92%;}}</style></div><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-1"><p>On Thursday, February 10, 2022, AARC scholars presented about recently studied winners of academic honorific awards. The study included 14,139 awards, ranging in scope from Nobel Prizes to scholarly societies’ “Outstanding Young Researcher” and explored a variety of research questions. The presenters reviewed their findings and answered questions from participants.</p>
<p>Link to slides:  <a href="https://us-east-2.protection.sophos.com?d=doi.org&amp;u=aHR0cDovL2R4LmRvaS5vcmcvMTAuMTMxNDAvUkcuMi4yLjI0NzIyLjczOTI4&amp;i=NWI3YjI5ZGFhMjAwZmExNmMxYzRmODRi&amp;t=U2U1SGdObC9BWFJ2a05LSXFycjdWSHVJU0NDejhKandFK1JaZVU5Vkh1az0=&amp;h=9089dae099014533994e64179ec141b1">10.13140/RG.2.2.24722.73928</a></p>
</div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-0{width:100% !important;margin-top : 0px;margin-bottom : 0px;}.fusion-builder-column-0 > .fusion-column-wrapper {padding-top : 0px !important;padding-right : 0px !important;margin-right : 1.92%;padding-bottom : 0px !important;padding-left : 0px !important;margin-left : 1.92%;}@media only screen and (max-width:1024px) {.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-0{width:100% !important;}.fusion-builder-column-0 > .fusion-column-wrapper {margin-right : 1.92%;margin-left : 1.92%;}}@media only screen and (max-width:640px) {.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-0{width:100% !important;}.fusion-builder-column-0 > .fusion-column-wrapper {margin-right : 1.92%;margin-left : 1.92%;}}</style></div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-body .fusion-flex-container.fusion-builder-row-1{ padding-top : 0px;margin-top : 0px;padding-right : 0px;padding-bottom : 0px;margin-bottom : 0px;padding-left : 0px;}</style></div>


Video Playback: AARC Researchers Explore Honorific Awards

<p><a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0263410"><img class="alignleft wp-image-12710 size-medium" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/moreJournalSnap-231x300.png" alt="" width="231" height="300" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/moreJournalSnap-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/moreJournalSnap-231x300.png 231w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/moreJournalSnap-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/moreJournalSnap-600x778.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/moreJournalSnap.png 696w" sizes="(max-width: 231px) 100vw, 231px" /></a>AARC Senior Researcher Bill Savage and I recently published an article in <em>PLOS ONE</em> documenting changing publishing practices in the social sciences. In short, social scientists are, by and large, publishing more journal articles and fewer books than they were a decade ago. The trends we observed are much stronger than we anticipated &#8211; journal article publication has increased as much as 64% between 2011 and 2019, while book publication is down as much as 54% in the same period, with some variation across disciplines. The publication patterns of social science fields are becoming more similar to those of STEM areas, and less similar to the humanities.</p>
<p>We propose that this trend is, partially, a response to several external stimuli including increased research funding for explicitly quantitative social science projects making use of recently available big data (e.g., social media trends, digitized government records, geolocation data), journal article-centric research evaluation schemes, and increased collaboration rates (team science) among social scientists, resulting in more articles per person.</p>
<p>One question arising from this work is whether this trend represents a wholesale shift among social scientists (unlikely). I think it’s more likely that social scientists engage in a plurality of research methods, among which quantitative studies are growing in volume, following STEM’s trend towards greater rates of publication. Meanwhile, studies employing qualitative research methods (and mixed methods) also continue to thrive but have not grown in volume to the same degree as quantitative studies. A future study might seek to understand the extent to which studies employing qualitative research methods have grown or declined with respect to the increase in quantitative studies in the social sciences. Another related avenue for future research is exploring the relationship between the social sciences and the humanities, and whether the changing methods and publishing practices of the social sciences has impacted that relationship.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Anthony J. Olejniczak, Ph.D.</p>
<p>Director, Academic Analytics Research Center</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>References</p>
<p>Savage WE and Olejniczak AJ (2022) More journal articles and fewer books: Publication practices in the social sciences in the 2010’s. PLOS ONE doi: <a href="http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263410">10.1371/journal.pone.0263410</a>.</p>


The “quantification” of the Social Sciences

<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.812312" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img class="alignleft wp-image-12703 size-medium" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/rhythms-of-scholar-prod-snap-218x300.png" alt="" width="218" height="300" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/rhythms-of-scholar-prod-snap-200x276.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/rhythms-of-scholar-prod-snap-218x300.png 218w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/rhythms-of-scholar-prod-snap-400x552.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/rhythms-of-scholar-prod-snap-600x827.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/rhythms-of-scholar-prod-snap.png 631w" sizes="(max-width: 218px) 100vw, 218px" /></a></p>
<p>My colleagues Bill Savage, Dick Wheeler, and I recently published an opinion article in the journal <em>Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics</em> (<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.812312">https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.812312</a>). This paper is meant to accompany the expansive dataset on publishing patterns across disciplines that we recently made public (<a href="https://osf.io/myaut/">https://osf.io/myaut/</a>). In short, this article is meant to highlight that academe’s growing use of bibliometrics to evaluate academic units must be done judiciously, and even the best-intended bibliometric indicators do not always consider myriad factors specific to the discipline in question, as well as the individual who authored those publications.</p>
<p>Equally important to our thesis (that bibliometrics, when used, should complement expert review and should be modulated to account for discipline and career stage) is that scholars in many disciplines do not produce quantifiable “bibliometric artifacts” that are archived in databases. Assigning a DOI or other identifier to a particular class of work is uncommon in some disciplines, while it is common in others. Conference proceedings, for example, are often archived and catalogued in engineering and computer science fields, but this is not as often the case in the humanities and other fields. Across-discipline comparisons must consider the archiving traditions of different fields before meaningful comparisons can be made.</p>
<p>There are also modes of knowledge production that are not amenable to archiving. “Some works are ‘small circulation ephemera’ (e.g., zines as described by Brown et al., 2021), and archiving and cataloging these works may be antithetical to the ethos in which they were created.” As the pace of scholarly publication (at least in STEM areas and the Social Sciences) continues to accelerate along with the evaluation culture in which these publications are a de facto currency, it may be best to resist the temptation to include some types of research in bibliometric archives. Rather than expanding the quantification of scholarly outputs to include non-journal article modes of dissemination, we might encourage generative dialogue across disciplines about different knowledge generation and dissemination processes. Academe has an opportunity to move from “are we including all the relevant journals?” to questions that enhance interdisciplinary communication, such as “what knowledge dissemination types are pertinent to these disciplines?” and “do the types of knowledge production common in this discipline become quantifiable artifacts?”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Anthony J. Olejniczak, Ph.D.</p>
<p>Director, Academic Analytics Research Center</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>References</p>
<p>Brown, A., Hurley, M., Perry, S., and Roche, J. (2021). Zines as reflective evaluation within interdisciplinary learning programmes. Front. Educ. 6:675329. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.675329</p>
<p>Olejniczak AJ, Savage WE and Wheeler R (2022) The Rhythms of Scholarly Publication: Suggestions to Enhance Bibliometric Comparisons Across Disciplines. Front. Res. Metr. Anal. 7:812312. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.812312</p>


Should all research be archived?

<div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-2 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0);background-position: center center;background-repeat: no-repeat;border-width: 0px 0px 0px 0px;border-color:#e2e2e2;border-style:solid;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start" style="max-width:1248px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-1 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column" style="background-position:left top;background-repeat:no-repeat;-webkit-background-size:cover;-moz-background-size:cover;-o-background-size:cover;background-size:cover;padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;"><div class="fusion-video fusion-youtube" style="max-width:600px;max-height:360px;align-self:center; width:100%"><div class="video-shortcode"><iframe title="YouTube video player 2" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/0AFVBgXlEDY?wmode=transparent&autoplay=0" width="600" height="360" allowfullscreen allow="autoplay; fullscreen"></iframe></div></div><div class="fusion-section-separator section-separator triangle fusion-section-separator-2" style="margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:30px;"><div class="fusion-section-separator-svg" style="border-bottom:1px solid #e2e2e2;"><div class="divider-candy-arrow bottom" style="top:0px;border-top-color: #f9f9fb;"></div><div class="divider-candy bottom" style="bottom:-21px;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e2e2;border-left:1px solid #e2e2e2;"></div></div><div class="fusion-section-separator-spacer"><div class="fusion-section-separator-spacer-height" style="height:1px;"></div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-section-separator-2 .fusion-section-separator-svg {margin-left:1.92%;margin-right:1.92%;}@media only screen and (max-width:1024px) {.fusion-section-separator-2 .fusion-section-separator-svg {margin-left:1.92%;margin-right:1.92%;}}@media only screen and (max-width:640px) {.fusion-section-separator-2 .fusion-section-separator-svg {margin-left:1.92%;margin-right:1.92%;}}</style></div><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-2"><p>In November 2021, AARC hosted a webinar by researchers Sarah Rovito, Divyansh Kaushik, and Surya Dev Aggarwal of MIT discussing their study on the impact of international scholars on US research outputs an competitiveness. We’re delighted to make the playback of this webinar accessible to all. Please check out our conversation with the authors in the video below to learn more about this important research.</p>
<p>Link to the article in MIT Science Policy Review: <a href="http://doi.org/10.38105/spr.v079rp249k">10.38105/spr.v079rp249k</a></p>
</div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-1{width:100% !important;margin-top : 0px;margin-bottom : 20px;}.fusion-builder-column-1 > .fusion-column-wrapper {padding-top : 0px !important;padding-right : 0px !important;margin-right : 1.92%;padding-bottom : 0px !important;padding-left : 0px !important;margin-left : 1.92%;}@media only screen and (max-width:1024px) {.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-1{width:100% !important;order : 0;}.fusion-builder-column-1 > .fusion-column-wrapper {margin-right : 1.92%;margin-left : 1.92%;}}@media only screen and (max-width:640px) {.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-1{width:100% !important;order : 0;}.fusion-builder-column-1 > .fusion-column-wrapper {margin-right : 1.92%;margin-left : 1.92%;}}</style></div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-body .fusion-flex-container.fusion-builder-row-2{ padding-top : 0px;margin-top : 0px;padding-right : 0px;padding-bottom : 0px;margin-bottom : 0px;padding-left : 0px;}</style></div>


Video Playback: International Scholars and US Research Competitiveness

<p>AARC is proud to support Academic Analytics’ <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Academic-Analytics-Promotion-Tenure-.pdf">recent statement</a> on the use of quantitative information in promotion and tenure decisions. Our research at AARC seeks to emphasize the humanity of researchers, and to underscore that the people who produce research are separate from – and greater than – the quantified representation of their research outputs. We echo the below points from the Academic Analytics position statement:</p>
<p>1. The use of verifiable quantitative data in promotion and tenure is only one important indicator of a scholar’s productivity and must be supplemented with other kinds of information and with more nuanced indicators of quality.</p>
<p>2. Faculty members should have access to the research metrics used in promotion decisions about them, and they should have the opportunity to correct and supplement that record prior to any substantive review.</p>
<p>3. No database of research output is a comprehensive record of scholarly achievement. Journal articles, books, chapters, grant information, conference proceedings, and patents are traditional modes of research dissemination in many disciplines and often become bibliometric artifacts easily included in databases. But other modes of dissemination (e.g., exhibitions, storytelling, performances, choreography, musical composition, zine authorship, blog authorship, dataset production, software programs, opensource materials, public domain contributions, and media mentions) are valued in many disciplines. These venues are not captured in most databases, potentially disadvantaging scholars whose work is most often shared in those forms. Such gaps should be recognized and accounted for in evaluation processes.</p>
<p>4. Because research cultures vary widely across the disciplines, and even sub-disciplines (e.g., relative prominence of articles or books or conference proceedings; co-authorship vs. single authored work), administrative reviewers of faculty scholarship need to develop an informed understanding of realistic expectations for the disciplines under review.</p>
<p>5. Because the quantity of one’s research output does not equate to the quality and impact of a scholar’s research output, other means for evaluating significance, quality, and importance to the field of study should complement quantitative measures.</p>
<p>6. Research metrics cannot account for systemic biases or personal and social factors that may influence one’s research. Gender, racial, ethnic, mental health, disability, and age biases in the American academy are increasingly well-documented and may impact the venue, quantity (but not necessarily the quality) of output.</p>
<p>Please read the original position statement here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Academic-Analytics-Promotion-Tenure-.pdf">https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Academic-Analytics-Promotion-Tenure-.pdf</a></p>


Academic Analytics Data in the Context of Promotion and Tenure

<div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-3 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0);background-position: center center;background-repeat: no-repeat;border-width: 0px 0px 0px 0px;border-color:#e2e2e2;border-style:solid;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start" style="max-width:1248px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-2 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column" style="background-position:left top;background-repeat:no-repeat;-webkit-background-size:cover;-moz-background-size:cover;-o-background-size:cover;background-size:cover;padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-3" style="text-align:left;"><p>United States universities have a long history of welcoming international scholars as faculty members. International scholars contribute to the advancement of the US research enterprise in profound ways, across all areas of scholarship and R&amp;D. Recently, AARC was approached to supply data to a team of researchers exploring the contributions of international scholars, and we were delighted to see that study published in <em>MIT Science Policy Review</em>. The article, authored by S. Rovito, D. Kaushik, and D. Aggarwal, can be accessed here (<a href="http://doi.org/10.38105/spr.v079rp249k">http://doi.org/10.38105/spr.v079rp249k</a>). One major takeaway from the project is, as the authors state, “Intentional, strategic action is needed for the U.S. to continue to attract and retain scientific talent and to overcome outmoded visa laws and anti-immigrant rhetoric leading researchers to relocate elsewhere.”</p>
<p>We encourage you to read the article, and also to view our recent conversation with the authors to learn more about their research and the impact of international scholars on the US research enterprise:</p>
</div><div class="fusion-video fusion-youtube" style="max-width:600px;max-height:360px;align-self:center; width:100%"><div class="video-shortcode"><iframe title="YouTube video player 3" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/0AFVBgXlEDY?wmode=transparent&autoplay=0" width="600" height="360" allowfullscreen allow="autoplay; fullscreen"></iframe></div></div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-2{width:100% !important;margin-top : 0px;margin-bottom : 20px;}.fusion-builder-column-2 > .fusion-column-wrapper {padding-top : 0px !important;padding-right : 0px !important;margin-right : 1.92%;padding-bottom : 0px !important;padding-left : 0px !important;margin-left : 1.92%;}@media only screen and (max-width:1024px) {.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-2{width:100% !important;order : 0;}.fusion-builder-column-2 > .fusion-column-wrapper {margin-right : 1.92%;margin-left : 1.92%;}}@media only screen and (max-width:640px) {.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-2{width:100% !important;order : 0;}.fusion-builder-column-2 > .fusion-column-wrapper {margin-right : 1.92%;margin-left : 1.92%;}}</style></div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-body .fusion-flex-container.fusion-builder-row-3{ padding-top : 0px;margin-top : 0px;padding-right : 0px;padding-bottom : 0px;margin-bottom : 0px;padding-left : 0px;}</style></div>


International Scholars and the US Research Enterprise

<p>It has been a busy year for the Academic Analytics Research Center. We’ve conducted webinar presentations and published the results of a handful of research projects, and we’ve also provided public access to the data resources underlying a position paper on the rhythms of scholarly publication. As we head into the fall season, we’re looking back at what we’ve learned as we examined the national research environment so far this year.</p>
<h3><em>Are we too focused on journal articles?</em></h3>
<p>First and foremost, each academic discipline has its own identity and dynamic. How scholars conduct research and report their results changes from one discipline to another. Many engineering disciplines favor publication of conference proceedings, while the physical, biological, and health sciences rely almost exclusively on the journal article. The social sciences and humanities, on the other hand, employ a mix of journal articles, book chapters, and books for the dissemination of research. The figure below shows examples of the wide variety of disciplinary publishing strategies (image source: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/j8wec">10.31235/osf.io/j8wec</a>).</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter wp-image-12669" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-4-800x300.png" alt="% of publications in select disciplines" width="800" height="300" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-4-200x75.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-4-300x113.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-4-400x150.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-4-600x225.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-4-768x288.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-4-800x300.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-4-1024x384.png 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-4-1200x450.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-4-1536x576.png 1536w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.png 2400w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3><em>Career stage is related to publishing practices</em></h3>
<p>Different segments of a discipline’s population make their own distinctive contributions to the research literature. We found that early career researchers are publishing more articles than previous generations and appear to be setting an example for their more senior colleagues, encouraging them to do the same. At the same time, we have also found that senior researchers consistently publish more books and book chapters than their junior colleagues. Drawing on their years of experience, senior scholars shift their research focus to the review and synthesis of ideas and contribute to their respective disciplines through the publication of books and book chapters, as seen in the figure below (figure source: <a href="https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ves6g">10.31235/osf.io/ves6g</a>).</p>
<div id="attachment_12668" style="width: 810px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-12668" class="wp-image-12668" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-1024x1024.png" alt="Mean publications and faculty by academic age" width="800" height="800" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-150x150.png 150w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-300x300.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-1024x1024.png 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-5.png 3000w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /><p id="caption-attachment-12668" class="wp-caption-text">The mean number of scholarly outputs by academic age (years since terminal degree) in the field Anthropology. The histogram at the bottom shows the total population of scholars in this field by years since terminal degree. Vertical lines at 10 years and 30 years</p></div>
<h3><em>The “quantification” of the social and behavioral sciences influences publishing patterns</em></h3>
<p>Disciplines are evolving in response to changes in technology, knowledge creation and dissemination, and changes in the funding environment. With the advent of digital technology and the increasing importance of research through the quantitative exploration of massive databases, there has been a clear increase in journal article publication in the social science disciplines. At the same time, we also found that the influence of performance-based research assessment systems on faculty publishing and research decisions have contributed to a decline in the number of book publications, as seen in the figure below (figure source: <a href="http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15989.29922">10.13140/RG.2.2.15989.29922</a>).</p>
<div id="attachment_12670" style="width: 810px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-12670" class="wp-image-12670" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-800x200.png" alt="Population per discipline compared to books and journal articles" width="800" height="200" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-200x50.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-300x75.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-400x100.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-600x150.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-768x192.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-800x200.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1024x256.png 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1200x300.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/MicrosoftTeams-image-3.png 1496w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /><p id="caption-attachment-12670" class="wp-caption-text">Discipline population (blue dotted line), book publications (green line with triangles), and journal article publications (dashed line with circles) over time.</p></div>
<h3><em>Disciplines have publishing rhythms – analytical timeframe matters</em></h3>
<p>The tempo of research and publication varies from discipline to discipline. Some are fast; some are slow. Some require only months to see the impact of publication; others may require years. Thus, one’s choice of a comparative timeframe can have profound effects on cross disciplinary comparisons. This is particularly telling in the humanities. For example, we calculate that 81% of historians have published at least one book in the most recent 10-year period. However, looking at the most recent three years, only 42% of history faculty have authored a book. Clearly, a complete picture of disciplinary research activity requires a longer timeframe (publication rate data over different timeframes is available for all disciplines at: <a href="http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MYAUT">10.17605/OSF.IO/MYAUT</a>).</p>
<p>In all, we have gained an appreciation of national research activity as a kaleidoscope of research and publishing practices, each discipline requiring that it be understood and assessed on its own terms. A multiplicity of approaches to the creation of knowledge and dissemination of research results provides the greatest opportunities to gather rich observations about the complex world we live in.</p>


AARC research in 2021: what we’ve learned so far

<div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-4 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0);background-position: center center;background-repeat: no-repeat;border-width: 0px 0px 0px 0px;border-color:#e2e2e2;border-style:solid;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start" style="max-width:1248px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-3 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column" style="background-position:left top;background-repeat:no-repeat;-webkit-background-size:cover;-moz-background-size:cover;-o-background-size:cover;background-size:cover;padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;"><div class="fusion-video fusion-youtube" style="max-width:600px;max-height:360px;align-self:center; width:100%"><div class="video-shortcode"><iframe title="YouTube video player 4" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rruaFTRdjZU?wmode=transparent&autoplay=0" width="600" height="360" allowfullscreen allow="autoplay; fullscreen"></iframe></div></div><div class="fusion-section-separator section-separator triangle fusion-section-separator-3" style="margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:30px;"><div class="fusion-section-separator-svg" style="border-bottom:1px solid #e2e2e2;"><div class="divider-candy-arrow bottom" style="top:0px;border-top-color: #f9f9fb;"></div><div class="divider-candy bottom" style="bottom:-21px;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e2e2;border-left:1px solid #e2e2e2;"></div></div><div class="fusion-section-separator-spacer"><div class="fusion-section-separator-spacer-height" style="height:1px;"></div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-section-separator-3 .fusion-section-separator-svg {margin-left:1.92%;margin-right:1.92%;}@media only screen and (max-width:1024px) {.fusion-section-separator-3 .fusion-section-separator-svg {margin-left:1.92%;margin-right:1.92%;}}@media only screen and (max-width:640px) {.fusion-section-separator-3 .fusion-section-separator-svg {margin-left:1.92%;margin-right:1.92%;}}</style></div><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-4"><p style="text-align: center;">Please join us on April 13, 2021 at 1:00pm EDT to discuss our new research on the publication patterns of senior scholars relative to their colleagues. We explored journal articles, conference proceedings, books, and chapters in edited volumes across academic age cohorts &#8211; the work has been peer reviewed and is in press, join us for a preview of the results!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">To RSVP, please click the button below:</p>
</div><div style="text-align:center;"><style type="text/css">.fusion-button.button-1 {border-radius:4px;}</style><a class="fusion-button button-flat button-medium button-default button-1 fusion-button-span-no fusion-button-default-type" target="_self" href="http://www.academicanalytics.com/community/webinars/rsvp-aarc-april-webinar-website/"><span class="fusion-button-text">RSVP Today</span></a></div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-3{width:100% !important;margin-top : 0px;margin-bottom : 20px;}.fusion-builder-column-3 > .fusion-column-wrapper {padding-top : 0px !important;padding-right : 0px !important;margin-right : 1.92%;padding-bottom : 0px !important;padding-left : 0px !important;margin-left : 1.92%;}@media only screen and (max-width:1024px) {.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-3{width:100% !important;order : 0;}.fusion-builder-column-3 > .fusion-column-wrapper {margin-right : 1.92%;margin-left : 1.92%;}}@media only screen and (max-width:640px) {.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-3{width:100% !important;order : 0;}.fusion-builder-column-3 > .fusion-column-wrapper {margin-right : 1.92%;margin-left : 1.92%;}}</style></div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-body .fusion-flex-container.fusion-builder-row-4{ padding-top : 0px;margin-top : 0px;padding-right : 0px;padding-bottom : 0px;margin-bottom : 0px;padding-left : 0px;}</style></div>


Upcoming Webinar: Senior Scholar Publishing Activity

<p>AARC researchers are delighted to see our recent article “Who’s writing open access (OA) articles? Characteristics of OA authors at Ph.D.-granting institutions in the United States” discussed by the scholarly community, and we hope our findings contribute to the greater open access project and its goal to democratize the research literature. <a href="https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/qss_a_00091">Here’s a link to the article</a>. Recently, for instance, journalist Benjamin Plackett published an article in <a href="https://www.natureindex.com/">Nature Index</a> discussing inequity in open access publishing (<a href="https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/equity-concerns-persist-over-open-access-publishing">click here to read the article</a>). The article is concise and informative, including interviews and quotes from scholars (including AARC Director Anthony J. Olejniczak).</p>
<p>We’ve also noticed that the discussion about our article on social media has largely been about only one of the two major findings our article presented: publication of open access articles with article processing charges (APCs) “appears to be skewed toward scholars with greater access to resources and job security.” We also think this an important finding, but we urge readers to interpret the result in the context of our other major finding: that publication of <em><strong>any</strong> </em>open access article (regardless of APCs) follows the same pattern, albeit to a slightly lesser degree if APCs are not involved.</p>
<p>There is an important conversation happening in the academy and publishing industry about APCs (see, e.g., a <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4558704#.YEpAbLCSkuU">recent report on Diamond Open Access</a>) &#8211; whether APCs should exist, and if so who should pay for them. We at AARC strongly support moving to a model that makes publishing and reading free for authors and readers, respectively. But we also feel it is only one piece (a big piece, certainly, but only one) of the inequity puzzle in open access publishing. Even when green and bronze open access articles are included in our regression model, inequities persist. Here’s figure 4 from our article, showing the exponentiated coefficients from our regression model predicting the number of open access articles authored including all (not just APC) open access authorships:</p>
<div id="attachment_12416" style="width: 572px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00091"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-12416" class=" wp-image-12416" src="http://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Figure-4-scaled.jpeg" alt="" width="562" height="353" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-12416" class="wp-caption-text">Figure 4 from Olejniczak and Wilson (2020): https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00091</p></div>
<p>Clearly APCs act as a barrier to some, further entrenching extant inequity in the academic publishing sphere, but it should not be lost in the discussion that <em><strong>all</strong></em> forms of OA exhibit a similar pattern. Clearly there is work to be done not only in terms of the cost and economic model, but also towards the more equitable adoption of OA of all types.</p>


Open access inequity is not only about article processing charges (APCs)

<div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-5 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0);background-position: center center;background-repeat: no-repeat;border-width: 0px 0px 0px 0px;border-color:#e2e2e2;border-style:solid;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start" style="max-width:calc( 1200px + 0px );margin-left: calc(-0px / 2 );margin-right: calc(-0px / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-4 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column" style="background-position:left top;background-repeat:no-repeat;-webkit-background-size:cover;-moz-background-size:cover;-o-background-size:cover;background-size:cover;padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;"><div class="fusion-video fusion-youtube" style="max-width:600px;max-height:360px;align-self:center; width:100%"><div class="video-shortcode"><iframe title="YouTube video player 5" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/e0DBdCE3Z5M?wmode=transparent&autoplay=0" width="600" height="360" allowfullscreen allow="autoplay; fullscreen"></iframe></div></div><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-5"><p>Last week, AARC researchers Dr. Molly J. Wilson and Dr. Anthony J. Olejniczak discussed their recent paper <a href="https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/qss_a_00091"><em>Who’s writing Open Access (OA) articles? Characteristics of OA authors at Ph.D. granting institutions in the USA</em></a> with a live audience via webinar. The discussion was excellent, and the playback is available here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/community/webinars/rsvp-aarc-feb-website/">link to request playback</a>.</p>
<p>The next AARC webinar will be on April 13, 2021 at 1:30pm EST, about the publication outputs (journal articles, books, chapters, and conference proceedings) of senior scholars relative to other age cohorts. <a href="https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/vznty">A preprint is available</a> while the paper is in the peer review process, we hope you&#8217;ll join us!</p>
</div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-4{width:100% !important;margin-top : 0px;margin-bottom : 0px;}.fusion-builder-column-4 > .fusion-column-wrapper {padding-top : 0px !important;padding-right : 0px !important;margin-right : 0px;padding-bottom : 0px !important;padding-left : 0px !important;margin-left : 0px;}@media only screen and (max-width:1024px) {.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-4{width:100% !important;}.fusion-builder-column-4 > .fusion-column-wrapper {margin-right : 0px;margin-left : 0px;}}@media only screen and (max-width:640px) {.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-4{width:100% !important;}.fusion-builder-column-4 > .fusion-column-wrapper {margin-right : 0px;margin-left : 0px;}}</style></div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-body .fusion-flex-container.fusion-builder-row-5{ padding-top : 0px;margin-top : 0px;padding-right : 0px;padding-bottom : 0px;margin-bottom : 0px;padding-left : 0px;}</style></div>


Replay: Who&#8217;s Publishing Open Access Articles?

Who&#8217;s being honored in academia?

<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-12208 alignleft" src="http://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/typewriter-300x232.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="232" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/typewriter-200x155.jpg 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/typewriter-300x232.jpg 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/typewriter-400x309.jpg 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/typewriter-600x464.jpg 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/typewriter-768x593.jpg 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/typewriter-800x618.jpg 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/typewriter-1024x791.jpg 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/typewriter-1200x927.jpg 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/typewriter-1536x1187.jpg 1536w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/typewriter.jpg 1650w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />Preprints have been around for a few decades, but posting preprints to a repository has only become the new normal for scholars in recent years. Preprints allow researchers to stake a claim to their ideas and results by establishing a clear and timestamped record of their work, even if <a href="https://www.theeditorialhub.com/blog/authors-editors-peer-review/why-peer-review-taking-so-long">the peer review process drags on for months</a>. Preprints also facilitate rapid communication among scholars, which can be critical during times of crisis; the COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, <a href="https://www.fastcompany.com/90537072/how-the-covid-19-crisis-has-prompted-a-revolution-in-scientific-publishing">led to a surge in preprint publications across several fields of study</a>.</p>
<p>The rise of preprints leads to many new research questions, including that asked by <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/9/1/5">Pagliaro (2021)</a> in a recently published paper in the journal <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/journal/publications"><em>Publications</em></a>: do manuscripts change substantially between preprint posting and the final, peer-reviewed version of the article? Following in the footsteps of scholars who studied this question in Physics and Biological Sciences, Pagliaro studied a small sample of Chemistry articles, finding &#8220;the differences between preprints and the corresponding articles published after peer review are small.&#8221;</p>
<p>The implications of only &#8220;small&#8221; changes to preprints as they wind their way through the editorial and peer review process raises questions about the institution of peer review (also discussed by Pagliaro). There are also important implications for bibliometric and scientometric data aggregators (including <a href="http://www.academicanalytics.com">Academic Analytics</a>), however, who typically include &#8220;peer-reviewed&#8221; as a criterion for including a scholarly research artifact in their databases (effectively precluding preprints from having a role in the research strategy and planning exercises that are carried out based on these databases).</p>
<p>On one hand, including preprints in bibliometric databases necessitates substantial additional investment in disambiguation and data merging. The preprint (which often has its own DOI) eventually needs to be linked to the final published version of the paper so the same research output is not recorded as two artifacts of research (or at least so the end user can identify that the same manuscript resulted in two artifacts) rather than &#8220;double-counting&#8221; the manuscript. There are also cases where preprints never result in a peer-reviewed journal article; in these cases, counting preprints among the number of publications for an institution/department/scholar may incentivize the production of preprints for which the author has no intention of ultimately putting the ideas or results through peer-review.</p>
<p>On the other hand, excluding preprints from bibliometric databases signals that preprints are not valuable enough to be considered among the other artifacts produced by scholars (&#8220;value&#8221; here meaning <a href="https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0010.107?view=text;rgn=main">the purported value conferred through the peer review process</a>). Clearly this is not a fair characterization of preprints, which have tremendous value. With the efficacy of <a href="https://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60/">peer</a> <a href="https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.22784">review</a> <a href="https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(18)30707-9/fulltext">increasingly</a> <a href="https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/123/9/1964/282957">called</a> <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25675064/">into</a> <a href="https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2015/05/opinion-chronicle-odom-bias-peer-review">question</a>, it may be time for bibliometric database providers to mobilize resources to solve the problems of &#8220;double-counting&#8221; and what to do with preprints that never make their way into traditional journals.</p>
<p>We are eager to hear your thoughts on preprints and whether (and how) bibliometric databases can include them to more fully represent the research outputs of scholars.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Reference Cited:</p>
<p>Pagliaro M. Preprints in Chemistry: An Exploratory Analysis of Differences with Journal Articles. Publications. 2021; 9(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010005</p>


The preprint conundrum for bibliometric databases

<p>AARC scholars work with many datasets describing the publication outputs of research faculty. These datasets are almost always zero-inflated, or at least are skewed toward the lower end of the distribution. This phenomenon is so common we’ve even changed how we perform regression analyses to account for these skewed distributions (e.g., we ran hurdle regressions in <a href="https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/qss_a_00091">our paper on Open Access publication trends</a>). The histogram below shows the average number of journal articles published by scholars in departments classified as “Physics” over the past 10 years:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-12157" src="http://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Physics-300x117.png" alt="" width="300" height="117" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Physics-200x78.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Physics-300x117.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Physics-400x156.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Physics-600x234.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Physics.png 700w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<p>The data are clearly skewed towards the left side of the plot, between 0-100 articles per person over 10 years. The mean number of articles published over 10 years is 91.7 (green vertical line) and the median number of articles is 32 (red vertical line); however, a few physicists have as many as 1,100 articles over that 10-year span. These scholars are generally associated with massive multi-institution and multi-year projects such as CERN, so we looked at several other disciplines outside the natural sciences to see whether the pattern persists – the image below is for English Language and Literature journal articles over the same 10-year period:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-12158" src="http://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/English-300x117.png" alt="" width="300" height="117" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/English-200x78.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/English-300x117.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/English-400x156.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/English-600x234.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/English.png 700w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<p>Indeed, the distribution looks similar to that seen for physicists. In English, the mean number of journal articles per person over 10 years (green vertical line) is 3.8, while the median is 2.0 articles (red vertical line). A small number of English faculty members have published upwards of 50 journal articles over the 10-year period.</p>
<p>The skewness of these publication metrics complicates interpretation of discipline norms, with meaningful consequences for the faculty, administrators, and other committee members charged with comparing discipline publishing patterns for strategic planning. In English, the median number of journal articles published is about one half of the mean value, and in Physics the median is about one third of the mean value. Although means are commonly used in bibliometric comparisons, choosing the mean as the unit of comparison biases the data towards the few examples at the extreme right end of the publishing distribution.</p>
<p>For these reasons, we believe the median is often the more appropriate measure for intra- and interdisciplinary analysis and bibliometric comparisons. University-wide planning and evaluation are better served by focusing on discipline (or peer group) norms such as the median, rather than numbers incorporating the most extreme cases and perhaps setting unrealistic publishing expectations.</p>
<p><em>(the data above are from database version AAD2019-1470)</em></p>


Should interdisciplinary comparisons of journal article publications use the mean or median?

<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-12179 alignleft" src="http://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/arrow-300x194.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="194" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/arrow-200x129.jpg 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/arrow-300x194.jpg 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/arrow-400x258.jpg 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/arrow-600x388.jpg 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/arrow-768x496.jpg 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/arrow-800x517.jpg 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/arrow-1024x662.jpg 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/arrow-1200x775.jpg 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/arrow.jpg 1280w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />Scholars at AARC are working hard on a project aimed at quantifying the dizzying growth of Ph.D. education in the US over the past 25 years (more on that project in a few months). As we looked at the number of Ph.D. graduates and the number of programs over time, we realized that growth in those areas probably means growth in another metric- the number of faculty members mentoring those students and teaching in those programs. The table below shows the number of Ph.D. program faculty by broad field as of 2019 (Academic Analytics database version AAD2019-1470):</p>

<table id="tablepress-3" class="tablepress tablepress-id-3">
<thead>
<tr class="row-1 odd">
	<th class="column-1">Field</th><th class="column-2"># Faculty</th><th class="column-3">% Faculty</th><th class="column-4">&nbsp;</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody class="row-hover">
<tr class="row-2 even">
	<td class="column-1">Biological and Biomedical Sciences</td><td class="column-2"> 43,196 </td><td class="column-3">21.3%</td><td class="column-4"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-3 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Physical and Mathematical Sciences</td><td class="column-2"> 34,041 </td><td class="column-3">16.8%</td><td class="column-4"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-4 even">
	<td class="column-1">Engineering</td><td class="column-2"> 26,836 </td><td class="column-3">13.2%</td><td class="column-4"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-5 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Social and Behavioral Sciences</td><td class="column-2"> 26,338 </td><td class="column-3">13.0%</td><td class="column-4"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-6 even">
	<td class="column-1">Humanities</td><td class="column-2"> 22,102 </td><td class="column-3">10.9%</td><td class="column-4"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-7 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Health Professions Sciences</td><td class="column-2"> 11,929 </td><td class="column-3">5.9%</td><td class="column-4"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-8 even">
	<td class="column-1">Family, Consumer and Human Sciences</td><td class="column-2"> 10,207 </td><td class="column-3">5.0%</td><td class="column-4"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-9 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Business</td><td class="column-2"> 9,119 </td><td class="column-3">4.5%</td><td class="column-4"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-10 even">
	<td class="column-1">Education</td><td class="column-2"> 8,416 </td><td class="column-3">4.1%</td><td class="column-4"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-11 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Natural Resources and Conservation</td><td class="column-2"> 5,596 </td><td class="column-3">2.8%</td><td class="column-4"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-12 even">
	<td class="column-1">Agricultural Sciences</td><td class="column-2"> 5,114 </td><td class="column-3">2.5%</td><td class="column-4"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<p>Biological and biomedical sciences Ph.D. programs involve more faculty members than any other broad field of study, by about 5%. Breaking this down into individual disciplines, here are the 10 most populous (in terms of faculty members) Ph.D. program disciplines in the US:</p>

<table id="tablepress-4" class="tablepress tablepress-id-4">
<thead>
<tr class="row-1 odd">
	<th class="column-1">Discipline</th><th class="column-2"># Faculty</th><th class="column-3">% Faculty</th><th class="column-4">Rank (Population)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody class="row-hover">
<tr class="row-2 even">
	<td class="column-1">Neurobiology/Neuroscience</td><td class="column-2">7,709</td><td class="column-3">2.74%</td><td class="column-4">1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-3 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Molecular Biology</td><td class="column-2">7,627</td><td class="column-3">2.71%</td><td class="column-4">2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-4 even">
	<td class="column-1">Cell Biology</td><td class="column-2">7,096</td><td class="column-3">2.52%</td><td class="column-4">3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-5 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Computer Science</td><td class="column-2">5,923</td><td class="column-3">2.11%</td><td class="column-4">4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-6 even">
	<td class="column-1">Physics, General</td><td class="column-2">5,672</td><td class="column-3">2.02%</td><td class="column-4">5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-7 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Mathematics</td><td class="column-2">5,642</td><td class="column-3">2.01%</td><td class="column-4">6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-8 even">
	<td class="column-1">Electrical Engineering</td><td class="column-2">5,548</td><td class="column-3">1.97%</td><td class="column-4">7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-9 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Biochemistry</td><td class="column-2">5,397</td><td class="column-3">1.92%</td><td class="column-4">8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-10 even">
	<td class="column-1">Biology/Biological Sciences, General</td><td class="column-2">5,352</td><td class="column-3">1.90%</td><td class="column-4">9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-11 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Chemistry</td><td class="column-2">5,248</td><td class="column-3">1.87%</td><td class="column-4">10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<p>Several disciplines from outside the life sciences make the “top 10” most populous list. What’s unclear is how recent the above table came to look this way – Neuroscience is the largest (by faculty population) Ph.D. discipline in the US, but was that the case 5 years ago? 10 years ago? It will be informative to uncover the history of growth over time in each field, and to attempt to trace that growth to the underlying causes.</p>

What are the biggest fields in Ph.D. education?

<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-12169 alignleft" src="http://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Untitled-design-1-300x232.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="232" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Untitled-design-1-200x155.jpg 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Untitled-design-1-300x232.jpg 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Untitled-design-1-400x309.jpg 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Untitled-design-1-600x464.jpg 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Untitled-design-1-768x593.jpg 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Untitled-design-1-800x618.jpg 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Untitled-design-1-1024x791.jpg 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Untitled-design-1-1200x927.jpg 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Untitled-design-1-1536x1187.jpg 1536w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Untitled-design-1.jpg 1650w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />AARC scholars have a manuscript in review about the graying of the American professoriate (see the preprint here: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/vznty">10.31235/osf.io/vznty</a>). As we explored the publication patterns of early career, middle career, and senior scholars, a basic question emerged that we didn’t include in our original study: are some academic fields home to “older” faculty than others, on average?</p>
<p>The table below shows the 10 “oldest” fields in the Academic Analytics database (version AAD2019-1470); we infer age from the year each scholar earned their Ph.D. (or other terminal degree, MFA, MBA, etc.) for all ranked professors in each of 171 fields:</p>

<table id="tablepress-1" class="tablepress tablepress-id-1">
<thead>
<tr class="row-1 odd">
	<th class="column-1">Field</th><th class="column-2">Mean Ph.D. Year</th><th class="column-3">Median Ph.D. Year</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody class="row-hover">
<tr class="row-2 even">
	<td class="column-1">Biophysics</td><td class="column-2">1991.9</td><td class="column-3">1993</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-3 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Immunology</td><td class="column-2">1993.3</td><td class="column-3">1994</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-4 even">
	<td class="column-1">Microbiology</td><td class="column-2">1993.6</td><td class="column-3">1994</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-5 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Molecular Biology</td><td class="column-2">1993.7</td><td class="column-3">1994</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-6 even">
	<td class="column-1">Molecular Genetics</td><td class="column-2">1993.6</td><td class="column-3">1994</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-7 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Oral Biology and Craniofacial Science</td><td class="column-2">1994.8</td><td class="column-3">1994</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-8 even">
	<td class="column-1">Toxicology</td><td class="column-2">1993.8</td><td class="column-3">1994</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-9 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Anatomy</td><td class="column-2">1993.7</td><td class="column-3">1995</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-10 even">
	<td class="column-1">Biochemistry</td><td class="column-2">1994.2</td><td class="column-3">1995</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-11 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Botany/Plant Biology</td><td class="column-2">1995.0</td><td class="column-3">1995</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<p>Surprisingly, all 10 of the oldest fields are in the relatively fast-paced biological/biomedical sciences. We expected academic age to correspond to the pace of publication, but we failed to account for an important component of the career trajectory of many life scientists – the postdoctoral phase.</p>
<p>In light of the data above, we now hypothesize that life scientists aren’t actually older than their peers in other fields, just that the youngest scholars aren’t part of the sample – they are doing postdocs (see, e.g., <a href="https://www.nature.com/news/the-future-of-the-postdoc-1.17253">this Nature news article from 2015</a>).</p>
<p>For comparison, here are the mean and median Ph.D. years for some other common fields:</p>

<table id="tablepress-2" class="tablepress tablepress-id-2">
<thead>
<tr class="row-1 odd">
	<th class="column-1">Field</th><th class="column-2">Mean Ph.D. Year</th><th class="column-3">Median Ph.D. Year</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody class="row-hover">
<tr class="row-2 even">
	<td class="column-1">Physics</td><td class="column-2">1994.6</td><td class="column-3">1996</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-3 odd">
	<td class="column-1">English Language and Literature</td><td class="column-2">1998.0</td><td class="column-3">1999</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-4 even">
	<td class="column-1">History</td><td class="column-2">1998.3</td><td class="column-3">2000</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-5 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Anthropology</td><td class="column-2">1999.2</td><td class="column-3">2001</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-6 even">
	<td class="column-1">Economics</td><td class="column-2">1999.4</td><td class="column-3">2002</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-7 odd">
	<td class="column-1">Computer Science</td><td class="column-2">2000.5</td><td class="column-3">2002</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<p>As is always the case, interpreting data across disciplines requires nuance. Faculty members, university administrators, and other committee members charged with interdisciplinary comparisons must always be cautious – the data themselves often conceal important field-level differences that aren’t obvious at first glance.</p>

Are some academic fields &#8220;older&#8221; than others?

<p><a href="https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/01/new-mandate-highlights-costs-benefits-making-all-scientific-articles-free-read"><img class="alignleft wp-image-11729" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screenshot-2021-01-08-103308.png" alt="" width="265" height="221" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screenshot-2021-01-08-103308-200x167.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screenshot-2021-01-08-103308-300x250.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screenshot-2021-01-08-103308-400x333.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screenshot-2021-01-08-103308-600x500.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screenshot-2021-01-08-103308-768x640.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screenshot-2021-01-08-103308-800x666.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screenshot-2021-01-08-103308.png 844w" sizes="(max-width: 265px) 100vw, 265px" /></a>On January 1, <em>Science</em> published a news story by Jeffrey Brainard about <a href="https://www.coalition-s.org/">Plan S</a> and Open Access publishing (the<a href="https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/01/new-mandate-highlights-costs-benefits-making-all-scientific-articles-free-read"> story is available here</a>). Brainard&#8217;s story describes Plan S (a mainly European initiative mandating free and immediate access to articles published by authors supported by public grants) and provides a primer on the state of Open Access publishing, how it benefits authors, and some of the criticisms of the OA financial model. Academic Analytics and the Academic Analytics Research Center (AARC) strongly support Open Access publishing, and we are delighted that a recently published article by AARC researchers Anthony J. Olejniczak and Molly J. Wilson was discussed in the news article (our article can be downloaded from the publisher&#8217;s site: <a href="https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/qss_a_00091">https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/full/10.1162/qss_a_00091</a>). Open Access publishing is a major step forward for the publishing industry, but an author&#8217;s ability to afford article processing charges should not determine whether that author&#8217;s work is freely and immediately available to their colleagues and the public.</p>


Open Access and Plan S in the News

<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.utsa.edu/today/2020/12/story/academic-analytics-portal-launches.html"><img class="wp-image-11233 aligncenter" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screenshot-2020-12-07-133114.png" alt="UTSA Announcement About Academic Analytics Dashboard" width="433" height="267" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screenshot-2020-12-07-133114-200x123.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screenshot-2020-12-07-133114-300x185.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screenshot-2020-12-07-133114-400x247.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screenshot-2020-12-07-133114-600x370.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screenshot-2020-12-07-133114-768x474.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screenshot-2020-12-07-133114-800x494.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screenshot-2020-12-07-133114-1024x632.png 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screenshot-2020-12-07-133114-1200x741.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screenshot-2020-12-07-133114.png 1440w" sizes="(max-width: 433px) 100vw, 433px" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">UTSA launches comprehensive tool to manage research portfolios &#8211; <a href="https://www.utsa.edu/today/2020/12/story/academic-analytics-portal-launches.html">read the full story here</a>.</p>


UTSA launches comprehensive tool to manage research portfolios

<div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-6 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0);background-position: center center;background-repeat: no-repeat;border-width: 0px 0px 0px 0px;border-color:#e2e2e2;border-style:solid;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start" style="max-width:calc( 1200px + 0px );margin-left: calc(-0px / 2 );margin-right: calc(-0px / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-5 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column" style="background-position:left top;background-repeat:no-repeat;-webkit-background-size:cover;-moz-background-size:cover;-o-background-size:cover;background-size:cover;padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-6"><p>Director of Academic Analytics Research Center <a href="http://www.anthonyolejniczak.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anthony J. Olejniczak, Ph.D.</a>, talks about the Open Access (OA) publication model and AARC&#8217;s <a href="https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/qss_a_00091" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent article</a>, coauthored with Dr. Molly Wilson. The new article, &#8220;Who’s writing open access (OA) articles? Characteristics of OA authors at Ph.D.-granting institutions in the United States&#8221; is available at the journal <a href="https://www.mitpressjournals.org/loi/qss">Quantitative Social Sciences</a> (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00091" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">access the article via the DOI</a>: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00091" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1162/qss_a_00091</a>).</p>
<p><iframe id="player_1" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/I0z8mYVAfjo?enablejsapi=1&amp;wmode=opaque" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
</div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-5{width:100% !important;margin-top : 0px;margin-bottom : 0px;}.fusion-builder-column-5 > .fusion-column-wrapper {padding-top : 0px !important;padding-right : 0px !important;margin-right : 0px;padding-bottom : 0px !important;padding-left : 0px !important;margin-left : 0px;}@media only screen and (max-width:1024px) {.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-5{width:100% !important;}.fusion-builder-column-5 > .fusion-column-wrapper {margin-right : 0px;margin-left : 0px;}}@media only screen and (max-width:640px) {.fusion-body .fusion-builder-column-5{width:100% !important;}.fusion-builder-column-5 > .fusion-column-wrapper {margin-right : 0px;margin-left : 0px;}}</style></div></div><style type="text/css">.fusion-body .fusion-flex-container.fusion-builder-row-6{ padding-top : 0px;margin-top : 0px;padding-right : 0px;padding-bottom : 0px;margin-bottom : 0px;padding-left : 0px;}</style></div>


AARC and the Open Access (OA) publication model

<p><a href="https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/qss_a_00091"><img class="alignleft wp-image-10770" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Screenshot-2020-10-20-145206.png" alt="" width="397" height="361" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Screenshot-2020-10-20-145206-200x182.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Screenshot-2020-10-20-145206-300x274.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Screenshot-2020-10-20-145206-400x365.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Screenshot-2020-10-20-145206-600x547.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Screenshot-2020-10-20-145206-768x700.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Screenshot-2020-10-20-145206-800x730.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Screenshot-2020-10-20-145206-1024x934.png 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Screenshot-2020-10-20-145206-1200x1094.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Screenshot-2020-10-20-145206-1536x1401.png 1536w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Screenshot-2020-10-20-145206.png 1944w" sizes="(max-width: 397px) 100vw, 397px" /></a>AARC strongly supports the Open Access (OA) publication model, and the overarching goals of Open Science. We are committed to depositing the datasets we produce for our projects in a publicly accessible repository, and we commit to produce only OA articles. Upon the occasion of <a href="http://www.openaccessweek.org/">#OpenAccessWeek</a>, AARC researchers completed a study of Open Access literature, and their new study is now available on the <a href="https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/qss_a_00091"><i>Quantitative Science Studies</i> website</a>.</p>
<p>AARC Director Anthony J. Olejniczak, Ph.D. and AARC Researchers Molly J. Wilson, Ph.D. studied the characteristics of  authors who choose to publish their work in OA venues. Their article, titled <a href="https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/qss_a_00091"><i>Who’s writing Open Access (OA) articles? Characteristics of OA authors at Ph.D. granting institutions in the USA</i></a>, demonstrates that the democratization of the research literature through increased adoption of the OA publishing model may be skewed towards only a subset of scholars. Their findings are summarized in the article&#8217;s abstract:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>The open access (OA) publication movement aims to present research literature to the public at no cost and with no restrictions. While the democratization of access to scholarly literature is a primary focus of the movement, it remains unclear whether OA has uniformly democratized the corpus of freely available research, or whether authors who choose to publish in OA venues represent a particular subset of scholars &#8211; those with access to resources enabling them to afford article processing charges (APCs). We investigated the number of OA articles with article processing charges (APC OA) authored by 182,320 scholars with known demographic and institutional characteristics at American research universities across 11 broad fields of study. Results show, in general, that the likelihood for a scholar to author an APC OA article increases with male gender, employment at a prestigious institution (AAU member universities), association with a STEM discipline, greater federal research funding, and more advanced career stage (i.e., higher professorial rank). Participation in APC OA publishing appears to be skewed toward scholars with greater access to resources and job security.</em></p>
<ul>
<li>Article DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00091">10.1162/qss_a_00091</a></li>
<li>Link to the article at the publisher&#8217;s website: <a href="https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/qss_a_00091">https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/qss_a_00091</a></li>
<li>Link to the article preprint: <a href="https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/gcr32/">https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/gcr32/</a></li>
<li>Link to the project data: <a href="https://osf.io/sb8fq/">https://osf.io/sb8fq/</a></li>
</ul>


New AARC Journal Article: Who&#8217;s writing Open Access articles?

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Education_Broad.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-9860 alignleft" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Education_Broad-232x300.png" alt="Fast Facts - Education" width="295" height="381" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Education_Broad-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Education_Broad-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Education_Broad-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Education_Broad-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Education_Broad-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Education_Broad-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Education_Broad-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Education_Broad-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Education_Broad-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Education_Broad.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 295px) 100vw, 295px" /></a>This Fast Facts report covers the broad field of Education which is a level three subject in the Academic Analytics taxonomy. The disciplines included in this broad field are: Counselor Education, Curriculum and Instruction, Educational Evaluation and Research, Educational Leadership and Administration, Foundations of Education, Higher Education/Higher Education Administration, Mathematics Education, Science Education, Special Education, and Teacher Education.</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Collaborations with other broad fields most often involves researchers in Social and Behavioral Sciences where they account for 21.4% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Family, Consumer and Human Sciences, accounts for 8.1% of all co-authored journal publications in Education. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Education_Broad.pdf">Education</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Education

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Agricultural_Sciences_Broad.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-9856 alignleft" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Agricultural_Sciences_Broad-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Agricultural Sciences" width="294" height="380" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Agricultural_Sciences_Broad-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Agricultural_Sciences_Broad-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Agricultural_Sciences_Broad-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Agricultural_Sciences_Broad-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Agricultural_Sciences_Broad-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Agricultural_Sciences_Broad-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Agricultural_Sciences_Broad-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Agricultural_Sciences_Broad-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Agricultural_Sciences_Broad-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Agricultural_Sciences_Broad.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 294px) 100vw, 294px" /></a>This Fast Facts report covers the broad field of Agricultural Sciences which is a level three subject in the Academic Analytics taxonomy. Disciplines included in this broad field are: Agricultural Economics, Agriculture, Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Sciences, Food Science, Horticulture, Plant Sciences, and Soil Science.</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Collaborations with other broad fields most often involves researchers in Biological and Biomedical Sciences where they account for 22.1% of all co-authored journal publications. The next f requent collaborative field, Natural Resources and Conservation, accounts for 6.9% of all co-authored journal publications in Agricultural Sciences. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Agricultural_Sciences_Broad.pdf">Agricultural Sciences</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Agricultural Sciences

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Biological-and-Biomedical-Sciences_Broad.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-9858 alignleft" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Biological-and-Biomedical-Sciences_Broad-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Biological and Biomedical Sciences" width="255" height="330" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Biological-and-Biomedical-Sciences_Broad-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Biological-and-Biomedical-Sciences_Broad-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Biological-and-Biomedical-Sciences_Broad-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Biological-and-Biomedical-Sciences_Broad-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Biological-and-Biomedical-Sciences_Broad-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Biological-and-Biomedical-Sciences_Broad-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Biological-and-Biomedical-Sciences_Broad-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Biological-and-Biomedical-Sciences_Broad-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Biological-and-Biomedical-Sciences_Broad-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Biological-and-Biomedical-Sciences_Broad.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 255px) 100vw, 255px" /></a>This Fast Facts report covers the broad field of Biological and Biomedical Sciences which is a level three subject in the Academic Analytics taxonomy. This broad field includes the disciplines: Anatomy, Biochemistry, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Biology/Biological Sciences, Biomedical Sciences, Biophysics, Botany/Plant Biology, Cell Biology, Cognitive Science, Developmental Biology, Ecology, Entomology, Epidemiology, Evolutionary Biology, Genetics, Human and Medical Genetics, Immunology, Microbiology, Molecular Biology, Molecular Genetics, Molecular Pharmacology, Neurobiology/Neuroscience, Oncology and Cancer Biology, Oral Biology and Craniofacial Science, Pathology, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmacology, Physiology, Plant Pathology, Structural Biology, Toxicology, and Zoology.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Biological-and-Biomedical-Sciences_Broad.pdf">Biological and Biomedical Sciences</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Biological and Biomedical Sciences

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Civil_Engineering.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-9466 alignleft" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Civil_Engineering-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Civil Engineering" width="281" height="363" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Civil_Engineering-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Civil_Engineering-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Civil_Engineering-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Civil_Engineering-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Civil_Engineering-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Civil_Engineering-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Civil_Engineering-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Civil_Engineering-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Civil_Engineering-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Civil_Engineering.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 281px) 100vw, 281px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involve researchers in Environmental Engineering where they account for 21.3% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Geology/Earth Science, General, accounts for 17.6% of the total co-authored journal publications for Civil Engineering. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 41.6% of Civil Engineering faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Society of Civil Engineers provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 25% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we can infer gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Society of Civil Engineers is 90% of awards going to male scholars and 10% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Civil_Engineering.pdf">Civil Engineering</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Civil Engineering

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chemical_Engineering.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-9460 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chemical_Engineering-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Chemical_Engineering" width="272" height="352" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chemical_Engineering-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chemical_Engineering-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chemical_Engineering-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chemical_Engineering-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chemical_Engineering-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chemical_Engineering-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chemical_Engineering-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chemical_Engineering-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chemical_Engineering-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chemical_Engineering.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 272px) 100vw, 272px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involve researchers in Chemistry where they account for 10.2% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Agricultural/Biological Engineering and Bioengineering, accounts for 7.7% of the total co-authored journal publications for Chemical Engineering. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 57% of Chemical Engineering faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Institute of Chemical Engineers provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 13% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we can infer gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Institute of Chemical Engineers is 89% of awards going to male scholars and 11% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Chemical_Engineering.pdf">Chemical Engineering</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Chemical Engineering

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Business_Administration-.pdf"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9456 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Business_Administration-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Business Administration" width="232" height="300" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Business_Administration-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Business_Administration-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Business_Administration-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Business_Administration-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Business_Administration-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Business_Administration-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Business_Administration-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Business_Administration-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Business_Administration-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Business_Administration.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 232px) 100vw, 232px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involve researchers in Management where they account for 17.3% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Marketing, accounts for 8.2% of the total co-authored journal publications for Business Administration. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 37% of Business Administration faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Marketing Association provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 10% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we can infer gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Marketing Association is 72.5% of awards going to male scholars and 27.5% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Business_Administration-.pdf">Business Administration</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Business Administration

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Astronomy-and-Astrophysics.pdf"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9449 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Astronomy-and-Astrophysics-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Astronomy and Astrophysics" width="232" height="300" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Astronomy-and-Astrophysics-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Astronomy-and-Astrophysics-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Astronomy-and-Astrophysics-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Astronomy-and-Astrophysics-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Astronomy-and-Astrophysics-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Astronomy-and-Astrophysics-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Astronomy-and-Astrophysics-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Astronomy-and-Astrophysics-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Astronomy-and-Astrophysics-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Astronomy-and-Astrophysics.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 232px) 100vw, 232px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involve researchers in Physics, General, where they account for 47.6% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Geology/Earth Science, General, accounts for 2.5% of the total co-authored journal publications for Astronomy and Astrophysics. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 57.6% of Astronomy and Astrophysics faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Physical Society provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 19.9% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we can infer gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Physical Society is 87% of awards going to male scholars and 13% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Astronomy-and-Astrophysics.pdf">Astronomy and Astrophysics</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Astronomy and Astrophysics

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Aerospace-Engineering.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-9442 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Aerospace-Engineering-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts- Aerospace Engineering" width="271" height="350" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Aerospace-Engineering-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Aerospace-Engineering-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Aerospace-Engineering-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Aerospace-Engineering-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Aerospace-Engineering-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Aerospace-Engineering-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Aerospace-Engineering-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Aerospace-Engineering-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Aerospace-Engineering-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Aerospace-Engineering.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 271px) 100vw, 271px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involve researchers in Mechanical Engineering where they account for 8.7% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology, accounts for 5.7% of the total co-authored journal publications for Aerospace Engineering. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 45% of Aerospace Engineering faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 18.5% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we can infer gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers is 77.1% of awards going to male scholars and 22.9% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Aerospace-Engineering.pdf">Aerospace Engineering</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Aerospace Engineering

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AgriculturalBiological-Engineering-and-Bioengineering.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-9396 alignleft" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AgriculturalBiological-Engineering-and-Bioengineering-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Agricultural-Biological Engineering and Bioengineering" width="337" height="435" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AgriculturalBiological-Engineering-and-Bioengineering-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AgriculturalBiological-Engineering-and-Bioengineering-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AgriculturalBiological-Engineering-and-Bioengineering-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AgriculturalBiological-Engineering-and-Bioengineering-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AgriculturalBiological-Engineering-and-Bioengineering-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AgriculturalBiological-Engineering-and-Bioengineering-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AgriculturalBiological-Engineering-and-Bioengineering-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AgriculturalBiological-Engineering-and-Bioengineering-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AgriculturalBiological-Engineering-and-Bioengineering-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AgriculturalBiological-Engineering-and-Bioengineering.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 337px) 100vw, 337px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involve researchers in Chemical Engineering where they account for 7.5% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Chemistry, accounts for 5.7% of the total co-authored journal publications for Agricultural/Biological Engineering and Bioengineering. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 59% of Agricultural/Biological Engineering and Bioengineering faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 12% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we can infer gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers is 88% of awards going to male scholars and 12% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/AgriculturalBiological-Engineering-and-Bioengineering.pdf">Agricultural/Biological Engineering and Bioengineering</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Agricultural/Biological Engineering and Bioengineering

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Accounting.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-9391 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Accounting-232x300.png" alt="" width="294" height="381" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Accounting-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Accounting-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Accounting-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Accounting-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Accounting-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Accounting-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Accounting-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Accounting-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Accounting-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Accounting.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 294px) 100vw, 294px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involve researchers in Business Administration where they account for 9.1% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Management, accounts for 6% of the total co-authored journal publications for Accounting. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 20% of Accounting faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Accounting Association provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, granting 78.3% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we can infer gender, the distribution of awards provided by the American Accounting Association is 73.6% of awards going to male scholars and 26.4% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Accounting.pdf">Accounting</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Accounting

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atmospheric-Sciences-and-Meteorology.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-9343 alignleft" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atmospheric-Sciences-and-Meteorology-232x300.png" alt="" width="334" height="432" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atmospheric-Sciences-and-Meteorology-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atmospheric-Sciences-and-Meteorology-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atmospheric-Sciences-and-Meteorology-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atmospheric-Sciences-and-Meteorology-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atmospheric-Sciences-and-Meteorology-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atmospheric-Sciences-and-Meteorology-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atmospheric-Sciences-and-Meteorology-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atmospheric-Sciences-and-Meteorology-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atmospheric-Sciences-and-Meteorology-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atmospheric-Sciences-and-Meteorology.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 334px) 100vw, 334px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involve researchers in Geology/Earth Science, General where they account for 11.4% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Marine Sciences, accounts for 6.7% of the total co-authored journal publications for Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 41.4% of Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Geophysical Union provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 16% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we can infer gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Geophysical Union is 76% of awards going to male scholars and 24% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Atmospheric-Sciences-and-Meteorology.pdf">Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Art-History-and-Criticism-1.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-9332 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Art-History-and-Criticism-1-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Art History and Criticism" width="319" height="412" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Art-History-and-Criticism-1-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Art-History-and-Criticism-1-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Art-History-and-Criticism-1-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Art-History-and-Criticism-1-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Art-History-and-Criticism-1-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Art-History-and-Criticism-1-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Art-History-and-Criticism-1-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Art-History-and-Criticism-1-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Art-History-and-Criticism-1-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Art-History-and-Criticism-1.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 319px) 100vw, 319px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involve researchers in Performing and Visual Arts where they account for 11.5% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, History, accounts for 5.7% of the total co-authored journal publications for Art History and Criticism. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 45% of Art History and Criticism faculty have received a national honorific award. The National Endowment for the Humanities provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 11% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we can infer gender, the distribution of awards granted by the National Endowment for the Humanities is 40.9% of awards going to male scholars and 59.1% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Art-History-and-Criticism-1.pdf">Art History and Criticism</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Art History and Criticism

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anthropology-1.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-9338 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anthropology-1-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Anthropology" width="368" height="476" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anthropology-1-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anthropology-1-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anthropology-1-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anthropology-1-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anthropology-1-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anthropology-1-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anthropology-1-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anthropology-1-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anthropology-1-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anthropology-1.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 368px) 100vw, 368px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involve researchers in Geology/Earth Science where they account for 5.1% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Sociology, accounts for 4.5% of the total co-authored journal publications for Anthropology. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 51.8% of Anthropology faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Anthropological Association provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 12.7% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we can infer gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Anthropological Association is 44% of awards going to male scholars and 56% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anthropology-1.pdf">Anthropology</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Anthropology

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Public_Health_FastFacts.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-8712 alignleft" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Public_Health_FastFacts-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Public Health" width="312" height="403" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Public_Health_FastFacts-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Public_Health_FastFacts-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Public_Health_FastFacts-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Public_Health_FastFacts-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Public_Health_FastFacts-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Public_Health_FastFacts-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Public_Health_FastFacts-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Public_Health_FastFacts-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Public_Health_FastFacts-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Public_Health_FastFacts.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 312px) 100vw, 312px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Epidemiology where they account for 13.5% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Biostatistics, accounts for 6.5% of the total co-authored journal publications for Public Health. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 20.9% of Public Health faculty have received a national honorific award. The National Academy of Medicine provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 7.7% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the National Academy of Medicine is 58.5% of awards going to male scholars and 41.5% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Public_Health_FastFacts.pdf">Public Health</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Public Health

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Political_Science.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-8708 alignleft" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Political_Science-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Political Science" width="305" height="394" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Political_Science-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Political_Science-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Political_Science-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Political_Science-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Political_Science-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Political_Science-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Political_Science-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Political_Science-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Political_Science-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Political_Science.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 305px) 100vw, 305px" /></a>Public Policy is the discipline most often involved in collaborative research with 4.9% of all Political Science co-authored journal publications. The next two most frequent disciplines are International Affairs and Development and Economics with 4.9% and 4.2% of all Political Science co-authored journal publications, respectively. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research, and where they are located?</p>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 39.7% of Political Science faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Political Science Association provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 25.2% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Political Science Association is 67.6% of awards going to male scholars and 32.4% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Political_Science.pdf">Political Science</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Political Science

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Philosophy.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-8703 alignleft" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Philosophy-232x300.png" alt="" width="335" height="433" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Philosophy-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Philosophy-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Philosophy-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Philosophy-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Philosophy-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Philosophy-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Philosophy-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Philosophy-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Philosophy-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Philosophy.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 335px) 100vw, 335px" /></a>Collaboration with another discipline most often involves researchers in Psychology which accounts for 7.8% of all co-authored journal articles in Philosophy. The next most frequent discipline is Public Health with 5% of all co-authored journal articles in Philosophy. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 32.1% of Philosophy faculty have received a national honorific award. The National Endowment for the Humanities provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 23.6% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the National Endowment for the Humanities is 76.8% of awards going to male scholars and 23.2% going to female scholars</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Philosophy.pdf">Philosophy</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Philosophy

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Collabor<a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Molecular-Biology.pdf"><img class="wp-image-8614 alignleft" src="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Molecular-Biology-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Molecular Biology" width="324" height="419" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Molecular-Biology-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Molecular-Biology-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Molecular-Biology-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Molecular-Biology-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Molecular-Biology-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Molecular-Biology-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Molecular-Biology-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Molecular-Biology-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Molecular-Biology-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Molecular-Biology.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 324px) 100vw, 324px" /></a>ations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Biochemistry where they account for 7.1% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Cell Biology, accounts for 6.7% of the total co-authored journal publications for Molecular Biology. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 31.9% of Molecular Biology faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Association for the Advancement of Science provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 12.2% of recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Association for the Advancement of Science is 76.5% of awards going to male scholars and 23.5% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Molecular-Biology.pdf">Molecular Biology</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Molecular Biology

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Microbiology.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-8606 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Microbiology-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Microbiology" width="328" height="424" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Microbiology-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Microbiology-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Microbiology-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Microbiology-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Microbiology-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Microbiology-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Microbiology-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Microbiology-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Microbiology-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Microbiology.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 328px) 100vw, 328px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Immunology where they account for 10.6% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Pathology, accounts for 7.5% of the total co-authored journal publications for Microbiology. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 29.4% of Microbiology faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Society for Microbiology provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 19.8% of all tracked awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Society for Microbiology is 69% of awards going to male scholars and 31% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="http://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Microbiology.pdf">Microbiology</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Microbiology

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics.pdf"><img class="size-medium wp-image-8552 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Mathematics" width="232" height="300" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 232px) 100vw, 232px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Statistics which results in 7.2% of all co-authored publications in the discipline. The next two most frequent disciplines are Computer Science and Applied Mathematics with 4.7% and 3.3% of all co-authored publications, respectively. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Each year mathematicians are recognized for their contributions to knowledge by organizations such as the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the National Academy of Science.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mathematics.pdf">Mathematics</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>


FastFacts &#8211; Mathematics

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Materials_Science_and_Engineering.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-8544 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Materials_Science_and_Engineering-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Materials_Science_and_Engineering" width="354" height="457" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Materials_Science_and_Engineering-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Materials_Science_and_Engineering-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Materials_Science_and_Engineering-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Materials_Science_and_Engineering-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Materials_Science_and_Engineering-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Materials_Science_and_Engineering-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Materials_Science_and_Engineering-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Materials_Science_and_Engineering-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Materials_Science_and_Engineering-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Materials_Science_and_Engineering.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 354px) 100vw, 354px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Chemistry where they account for 8.9% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Physics, accounts for 8.7% of all co-authored journal articles in Materials Science and Engineering. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located? who best complement your research, and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 60.2% of Materials Science and Engineering faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Physical Society provides the most honorific awards for the discipline. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Physical Society is 84.5% of awards going to male scholars and 15.5% going to female scholars.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Materials_Science_and_Engineering.pdf">Materials Science and Engineering</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>


FastFacts &#8211; Materials Science and Engineering

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pharmaceutical-Sciences.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-8511 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pharmaceutical-Sciences-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Pharmaceutical Sciences" width="313" height="405" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pharmaceutical-Sciences-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pharmaceutical-Sciences-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pharmaceutical-Sciences-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pharmaceutical-Sciences-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pharmaceutical-Sciences-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pharmaceutical-Sciences-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pharmaceutical-Sciences-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pharmaceutical-Sciences-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pharmaceutical-Sciences-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pharmaceutical-Sciences.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 313px) 100vw, 313px" /></a> Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Pharmacology where they account for 6.2% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Biochemistry, accounts for 5.7% of all co-authored journal articles in Pharmaceutical Sciences. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 29.6% of Pharmaceutical Sciences faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education provides the most honorific awards for the discipline. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education is 71.4% of awards going to male scholars and 28.6% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Pharmaceutical-Sciences.pdf">Pharmaceutical Sciences</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Pharmaceutical Sciences

<div>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>This F<a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Business.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-8505 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Business-232x300.png" alt="" width="293" height="379" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Business-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Business-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Business-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Business-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Business-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Business-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Business-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Business-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Business-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Business.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 293px) 100vw, 293px" /></a>ast Facts report covers the broad field of Business which is a level 3 subject in the Academic Analytics taxonomy. This broad field includes the disciplines Accounting, Business Administration, Finance, Management, Management Information Systems, and Marketing.</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>Collaborations with other broad fields most often involves researchers in Social and Behavioral Sciences where they account for 11% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Engineering, accounts for 5.8% of all co-authored journal publications in Business. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Business.pdf">Business</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Business

<div>
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Finance-FastFacts.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-7783 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Finance-FastFacts-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Finance" width="302" height="391" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Finance-FastFacts-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Finance-FastFacts-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Finance-FastFacts-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Finance-FastFacts-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Finance-FastFacts-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Finance-FastFacts-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Finance-FastFacts-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Finance-FastFacts-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Finance-FastFacts-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Finance-FastFacts.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 302px) 100vw, 302px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Economics where they account for 15.41% of all co-authored journal publications in FINANCE. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 23.5% of Finance faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Finance Association provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 17% of all tracked awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Finance Association is 85.8% of awards going to male scholars and 14.2% going to female scholars.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Finance-FastFacts.pdf">Finance</a></p>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Finance

<div>
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Educational_Leadership_FastFacts.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-7767 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Educational_Leadership_FastFacts-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Educational Leadership" width="282" height="364" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Educational_Leadership_FastFacts-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Educational_Leadership_FastFacts-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Educational_Leadership_FastFacts-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Educational_Leadership_FastFacts-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Educational_Leadership_FastFacts-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Educational_Leadership_FastFacts-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Educational_Leadership_FastFacts-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Educational_Leadership_FastFacts-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Educational_Leadership_FastFacts.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 282px) 100vw, 282px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Education, General, where they account for 8% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Educational Psychology, accounts for 6.4% of the total co-authored journal publications in EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND ADMINISTRATION. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 22.7% of Educational Leadership and Administration faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Educational Research Association provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 11% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Educational Research Association is 56.1% of awards going to male scholars and 43.9% going to female scholars.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Educational_Leadership_FastFacts.pdf">Educational Leadership and Administration</a></p>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Educational Leadership and Administration

<div>
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalScience.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-7772 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalScience-232x300.png" alt="FastFacts - Environmental Science" width="287" height="371" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalScience-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalScience-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalScience-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalScience-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalScience-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalScience-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalScience-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalScience-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalScience-1200x1553.png 1200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalScience.png 1275w" sizes="(max-width: 287px) 100vw, 287px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Geology/Earth Science where they account for 8.8% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology, accounts for 5.6% of the total co-authored journal publications for ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 30% of Environmental Science faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Geophysical Union provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 8% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Geophysical Union is 82.4% of awards going to male scholars and 17.6% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalScience.pdf">Environmental Science</a></p>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Environmental Science

<div>
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalEngineering_2.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-7741" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalEngineering_2.png" alt="FastFacts - Environmental Engineering" width="311" height="403" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalEngineering_2-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalEngineering_2-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalEngineering_2-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalEngineering_2-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalEngineering_2-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalEngineering_2-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalEngineering_2-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalEngineering_2.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 311px) 100vw, 311px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Civil Engineering where they account for 8.7% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Geology/Earth Science accounts for 6.3% of the total co-authored journal publications for ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 38.3% of Environmental Engineering faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Society of Civil Engineers provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 22.3% of all tracked awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Society of Civil Engineers is 91.4% of awards going to male scholars and 8.6% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_EnvironmentalEngineering_2.pdf">Environmental Engineering</a></p>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Environmental Engineering

<div>
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Environmental_Health_Science_2.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-7731" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Environmental_Health_Science_2.png" alt="FastFacts - Environmental Health Sciences" width="322" height="417" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Environmental_Health_Science_2-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Environmental_Health_Science_2-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Environmental_Health_Science_2-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Environmental_Health_Science_2-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Environmental_Health_Science_2-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Environmental_Health_Science_2-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Environmental_Health_Science_2-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Environmental_Health_Science_2.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 322px) 100vw, 322px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Epidemiology where they account for 9.1% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Public Health, accounts for 6.9% of all co-authored journal publications in ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 18.2% of Environmental Health Sciences faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Association for the advancement of Science provides the most honorific awards for the discipline. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Association for the Advancement of Science is 79% of awards going to male scholars and 21% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Environmental_Health_Science_2.pdf">Environmental Health Sciences</a></p>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Environmental Health Sciences

<div>
<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Economics_2.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-7722" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Economics_2.png" alt="FastFacts - Economics" width="317" height="410" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Economics_2-200x259.png 200w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Economics_2-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Economics_2-400x518.png 400w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Economics_2-600x776.png 600w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Economics_2-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Economics_2-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Economics_2-800x1035.png 800w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Economics_2.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 317px) 100vw, 317px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Finance producing 5.3% of co-authored ECONOMICS journal publications. The next two most frequent collaborative disciplines are Public Policy and Business Administration accounting for 4.1% and 3.5% of co-authored Economics journal publications. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 31.5% of Economics faculty have received a national honorific award. The National Bureau of Economic Research confers the most honorific awards for the discipline, providing 24% of all disciplinary awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the National Bureau of Economic Research is 81.6% of awards going to male scholars and 18.4% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AA_Economics_2.pdf">Economics</a></p>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Economics

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AA_ComputerEngineering.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-7463" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Computer-Engineering-Full.png" alt="" width="301" height="390" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Computer-Engineering-Full-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Computer-Engineering-Full-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Computer-Engineering-Full-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Computer-Engineering-Full-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Computer-Engineering-Full.png 1324w" sizes="(max-width: 301px) 100vw, 301px" /></a>Collaboration with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science where it results in 15.2% and 7.6% of all co-authored journal publications in COMPUTER ENGINEERING. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 53.1% of Computer Engineering faculty have received a national honorific award. The Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 32% of awards in the database. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers is 90.4% of awards going to male scholars and 9.6% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AA_ComputerEngineering.pdf">Computer Engineering FastFacts</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Computer Engineering

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AA_ComputerScience.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-7454" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AA_ComputerScience.png" alt="FastFacts - Computer Science PDF report" width="425" height="550" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AA_ComputerScience-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AA_ComputerScience-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AA_ComputerScience-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AA_ComputerScience.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 425px) 100vw, 425px" /></a>Collaboration with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering and Information Science/Information Studies. Collaborations between COMPUTER SCIENCE and Electrical Engineering faculty produced 11.6% of co-authored Computer Science journal articles. Collaborations between Computer Science faculty and Computer Engineering and Information Science/Information Studies researchers accounted for 10.61% and 2.61% of co-authored Computer Science journal publications respectively. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div>
<div>
<div>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 50% of all Computer Science faculty have received an honorific award. The Association for Computing Machinery has provided a total of 1,321 awards to members of the discipline. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, 82.6% were to male scholars; 17.4% were to female scholars. Emphasizing the strong relationship between Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and its chapters have provided 984 awards to computer scientists. The distribution of awards is 84.2% of awards went to male scholars and 15.8% went to female scholars.</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/AA_ComputerScience.pdf">Computer Science FastFacts</a></span></div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Computer Science

<p>The staff at AARC wish you well during this time of immense challenges for the Academy. In recent weeks, scholars from many disciplines have posted studies on the COVID-19 pandemic to preprint repositories, as evidenced by the continuously updated Twitter feeds from preprint servers such as the clinical-focused medRxiv.</p>
<div id="attachment_7274" style="width: 286px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-7274" class="wp-image-7274" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Annotation-2020-03-31-180354.png" alt="" width="276" height="369" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Annotation-2020-03-31-180354-224x300.png 224w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Annotation-2020-03-31-180354-765x1024.png 765w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Annotation-2020-03-31-180354-768x1028.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Annotation-2020-03-31-180354-1147x1536.png 1147w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Annotation-2020-03-31-180354.png 1338w" sizes="(max-width: 276px) 100vw, 276px" /><p id="caption-attachment-7274" class="wp-caption-text">Screenshot of the medRxiv Twitter feed, ca. March 31, 2020</p></div>
<p>Research funders are making money available for scholarship on COVID-19, including new opportunities from NIH and a host of other funders.</p>
<div id="attachment_7272" style="width: 613px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-7272" class="wp-image-7272" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Annotation-2020-04-01-114241.png" alt="Screenshot of a grants.gov search for “COVID-19”" width="603" height="288" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Annotation-2020-04-01-114241-300x143.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Annotation-2020-04-01-114241-768x367.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Annotation-2020-04-01-114241-1024x490.png 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Annotation-2020-04-01-114241-1536x735.png 1536w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Annotation-2020-04-01-114241-1568x750.png 1568w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Annotation-2020-04-01-114241.png 3789w" sizes="(max-width: 603px) 100vw, 603px" /><p id="caption-attachment-7272" class="wp-caption-text">Screenshot of a grants.gov search for “COVID-19”, ca. March 31, 2020</p></div>
<p>We expect that all forms of scholarship and recognition &#8211; from research grants and journal articles to books, honorific awards, and citations &#8211; will be impacted in some way by the COVID-19 pandemic in the coming years. While many forms of research take months or even years to become available, preprints are one way to disseminate knowledge rapidly and without restriction. This level of access and timeliness make preprints ideal as a way to explore “real-time” scholarship on an emerging topic. Hopefully, the global mobilization of scholars to study all aspects of the novel coronavirus and present their results will hasten the end of this pandemic through knowledge production and sharing.</p>
<p>We’ve been monitoring preprint publication patterns through the course of the pandemic, keeping track of those studies whose title or abstract mention terms directly related to the current global health crisis (e.g., “coronavirus”, “COVID-19,” “SARS-CoV-2”, etc.). The medRxiv repository has seen a substantial increase in the number of preprints posted in the last 5 months, from around 200 preprints per month pre-pandemic (November, 2019), to more than 900 preprints in March, 2020. Interestingly, the uptick in preprints posted to medRxiv is due almost entirely to research about the novel coronavirus (in orange), although a slightly higher number of preprints on non-coronavirus related topics have also been posted in the last two months (in blue). In February, 43.7% of the preprints on medRxiv were related to the COVID-19 pandemic. In March, that number rose to 69.3%.</p>
<div id="attachment_7269" style="width: 435px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-7269" class="wp-image-7269 size-full" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/medRxiv-preprints-1.png" alt="" width="425" height="357" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/medRxiv-preprints-1-300x252.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/medRxiv-preprints-1.png 425w" sizes="(max-width: 425px) 100vw, 425px" /><p id="caption-attachment-7269" class="wp-caption-text">medRxiv preprints from January, 2020 through March, 2020</p></div>
<p>Other preprint servers that are not clinical-focused are seeing only a modest number of studies posted about COVID-19. In February, 2.0% of the preprints on bioRxiv were about coronavirus, in March this rose to 4.1%.</p>
<div id="attachment_7276" style="width: 435px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-7276" class="wp-image-7276 size-full" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/bioRxiv-preprints.png" alt="" width="425" height="358" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/bioRxiv-preprints-300x253.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/bioRxiv-preprints.png 425w" sizes="(max-width: 425px) 100vw, 425px" /><p id="caption-attachment-7276" class="wp-caption-text">bioRxiv preprints from January, 2020 through March, 2020</p></div>
<p>The arXiv repository describes itself as serving “physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering and systems science, and economics.” Nonetheless, 1.4% of the preprints posted to arXiv in March were about the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
<div id="attachment_7277" style="width: 435px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-7277" class="wp-image-7277 size-full" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/arXiv-preprints.png" alt="" width="425" height="358" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/arXiv-preprints-300x253.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/arXiv-preprints.png 425w" sizes="(max-width: 425px) 100vw, 425px" /><p id="caption-attachment-7277" class="wp-caption-text">arXiv preprints from January, 2020 through March, 2020</p></div>
<p>We will follow this trend in the coming weeks to explore how COVID-19 alters the research and publishing landscape, and we hope to include the results of research from other fields &#8211; particularly preprints from the social sciences, arts, and humanities. In the months and years ahead, we will look to identify patterns and changes, and adapt our database in light of the “new normal” brought about by this global pandemic. In the meantime, we are encouraged to see so many scholars sharing their work rapidly and without access restrictions or paywalls.</p>
<p>Best wishes from AARC, be well!</p>


Is COVID-19 changing the research landscape?

<p><img class="wp-image-6628 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-300x90.png" alt="AARC - Academic Analytics Research Center" width="230" height="69" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-300x90.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-768x231.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-1024x308.png 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-1536x462.png 1536w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-1568x471.png 1568w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965.png 1634w" sizes="(max-width: 230px) 100vw, 230px" /></p>
<p>Academic Analytics Research Center (AARC) scholars Anthony J. Olejniczak, Ph.D. and Molly J. Wilson, Ph.D. recently posted a preprint of their research on <a href="https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/gcr32">SocArXiv</a>. The manuscript, <em>Who’s writing Open Access (OA) articles? Characteristics of OA authors at Ph.D. granting institutions in the USA</em>, explores the authorship side of Open Access publishing. Here&#8217;s the abstract of their study:</p>
<p><em>The adoption of open access (OA) publishing has grown rapidly in the last two decades; an increasing share of the research literature is available to the public at no cost and with no restrictions. Despite the enormous growth of OA publishing, few studies have explored the characteristics of the authors who choose to publish their research as OA articles. Understanding who produces the increasing number of OA articles is crucial for publishers and the research community seeking to democratize the results of knowledge production. We investigated the number of OA articles authored by 182,320 scholars with known demographic and institutional characteristics at American research universities across 11 broad fields of study. Results show that male scholars at more prestigious institutions (e.g., AAU members) and scholars with greater job security (e.g., higher professorial rank) are likely to publish more OA articles. Securing federal research grants is also a significant predictor of OA publishing activity. Although OA is growing in terms of the quantity of articles published, participation in OA publishing appears to be skewed towards scholars in STEM fields with greater access to resources and greater job security.</em></p>
<p>To learn more please check out the preprint and feel free to offer any suggestions on the study as the authors prepare the manuscript for peer review: <a href="https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/gcr32">https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/gcr32</a></p>


AARC Preprint Posted &#8211; Who&#8217;s publishing open access articles?

<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong>UPDATE</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #ff6600;">Proposals are now due on Monday, April 20 2020 to accommodate changes due to COVID-19. Thank you for your patience and we wish everyone well during this period of workplace change.</span></strong></p>
<p><img class="wp-image-6628 aligncenter" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-300x90.png" alt="AARC - Academic Analytics Research Center" width="167" height="50" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-300x90.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-768x231.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-1024x308.png 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-1536x462.png 1536w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-1568x471.png 1568w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965.png 1634w" sizes="(max-width: 167px) 100vw, 167px" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Academic Analytics Research Center (AARC) Call for Proposals</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>January 21, 2020</strong></p>
<p>Academic Analytics is pleased to announce the formation of the <strong>Academic Analytics Research Center (AARC)</strong>. AARC is tasked with finding ways the Academic Analytics database can be applied to uncover and disseminate new data and findings on issues of concern to higher education and scholarly research. In addition to publishing original research, AARC also places the Academic Analytics database into the hands of other qualified researchers. From gender disparities in publishing and citations to the lifetime trajectory of faculty research activity in different fields of study, the Academic Analytics database is a rich resource for scholars seeking comprehensive information on research in higher education.</p>
<p>AARC will act as the sole point of contact for any researcher wishing to access the Academic Analytics database and will receive and review all research proposals involving Academic Analytics data. The Academic Analytics Research Center hereby announces a Request for Proposals for a scholarly research project using academic analytics data. The objective of this Request for Proposal is to locate scholars who will provide significant and publishable research projects using the Academic Analytics database, and to support those scholars with data at no cost. The full Request for Proposals can be downloaded here (PDF).</p>
<p>Documents for the Request for Proposals:</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/2020.01.20.Request-for-Proposals-2.pdf">Call for Proposals</a> (PDF)</li>
<li><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC-Research-Request-Form.pdf">AARC Research Request Form</a> (PDF)</li>
</ol>
<p>To contact AARC and for general inquiries: <a href="mailto:aarc@academicanalytics.com">aarc@academicanalytics.com</a> Point of contact for questions concerning a proposal and to whom proposal packages should be e-mailed:</p>
<p>Anthony J. Olejniczak, Ph.D.<br />
Director, Academic Analytics Research Center (AARC)<br />
Co-Founder, Academic Analytics<br />
Email: <a href="mailto:aolejniczak@academicanalytics.com">aolejniczak@academicanalytics.com</a><br />
Office: (614) 264-8098</p>


UPDATE: AARC Call for Proposals

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Communications_FastFacts_v1.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-6961 " src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Communications_FastFacts_v1.png" alt="" width="303" height="392" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Communications_FastFacts_v1-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Communications_FastFacts_v1-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Communications_FastFacts_v1-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Communications_FastFacts_v1.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 303px) 100vw, 303px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Mass Communications where they account for 11.8% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Psychology, accounts for 4.5% of all COMMUNICATION AND COMMUNICATION STUDIES co-authored journal publications. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 20.7% of Communication and Communication Studies faculty have received a national honorific award. The National Communication Association provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 36% of all tracked awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the National Communication Association is 58.4% of awards going to male scholars and 41.6% going to female scholars.</div>
</div>
<div><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Communications_FastFacts_v1.pdf">Communication and Communication Studies FastFacts</a></span></div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Communication and Communication Studies

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CommunicationsDisorders_FastFacts_v1.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-6956" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CommunicationsDisorders_FastFacts_v1.png" alt="" width="309" height="400" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CommunicationsDisorders_FastFacts_v1-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CommunicationsDisorders_FastFacts_v1-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CommunicationsDisorders_FastFacts_v1-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CommunicationsDisorders_FastFacts_v1.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 309px) 100vw, 309px" /></a><span style="color: #000120;">Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Speech and Hearing Sciences where they account for 12.2% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Psychology, General, accounts for 10.5% of all COMMUNICATION DISORDERS AND SCIENCES co-authored journal publications. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</span></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p><span style="color: #000120;">According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 25.3% of Communication Disorders and Sciences faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association provides the most honorific awards for the discipline. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association is 43.1% of awards going to male scholars and 56.9% going to female scholars.</span></p>
</div>
<div><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CommunicationsDisorders_FastFacts_v1.pdf">Communication Disorders and Sciences FastFacts</a></div>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Communication Disorders and Sciences

<p><img class="wp-image-6628 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-300x90.png" alt="AARC - Academic Analytics Research Center" width="230" height="69" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-300x90.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-768x231.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-1024x308.png 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-1536x462.png 1536w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-1568x471.png 1568w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965.png 1634w" sizes="(max-width: 230px) 100vw, 230px" /></p>
<p>Academic Analytics Research Center (AARC) scholars William E. Savage, Ph.D. and Anthony J. Olejniczak, Ph.D. recently posted a preprint of their research on <a href="https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/vznty/">SocArXiv</a>. The preprint, <em>Research publication productivity among senior faculty at Ph.D.-granting institutions in the United States</em>, documents the publishing patterns of early career, mid-career, and senior scholars in terms of books, book chapters, journal articles, and conference proceedings. Results show that rather than the commonly cited &#8220;peak-and-decline&#8221; model of career publishing patterns, senior scholars shift their focus away from journal articles and conference proceedings and focus on publishing books and chapters. To learn more please check out the preprint and feel free to offer any suggestions on the study as the authors prepare the manuscript for peer review: <a href="https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/vznty/">https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/vznty/</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>


AARC Preprint Posted &#8211; Senior Scholar Publication Productivity

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CellBiology_FastFacts_v2.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-6918 " src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CellBiology_FastFacts_v2.png" alt="" width="304" height="393" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CellBiology_FastFacts_v2-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CellBiology_FastFacts_v2-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CellBiology_FastFacts_v2-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CellBiology_FastFacts_v2.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 304px) 100vw, 304px" /></a><span style="color: #000120;">Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Molecular Biology where they account for 6.1% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative fi eld, Biochemistry, accounts for 5.8% of all co-authored journal articles in CELL BIOLOGY. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p><span style="color: #000120;">According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 31.5% of Cell Biology faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Association for the Advancement of Science provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 11.3% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Association for the Advancement of Science is 73% of awards going to male scholars and 27% going to female scholars.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CellBiology_FastFacts_v2.pdf">Cell Biology FastFacts</a></p>
</div>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Cell Biology

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biophysics_FastFacts_v2.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-6913 " src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biophysics_FastFacts_v2.png" alt="" width="252" height="326" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biophysics_FastFacts_v2-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biophysics_FastFacts_v2-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biophysics_FastFacts_v2-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biophysics_FastFacts_v2.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 252px) 100vw, 252px" /></a><span style="color: #000120;">Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Biochemistry where they account for 9% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative field, Physiology, accounts for 7.4% of all co-authored journal publications in BIOPHYSICS. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</span></p>
<div>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 38.4% of Biophysics faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Association for the Advancement of Science provides the most honorific awards for the discipline. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Association for the Advancement of Science is 83% of awards going to male scholars and 17% going to female scholars.</p>
</div>
<div><span style="color: #000120;">Download the full report here: </span><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biophysics_FastFacts_v2.pdf">Biophysics FastFacts</a></div>


FastFacts &#8211; Biophysics

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BiomedicalEngineering_FastFacts_v2.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-6906 " src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BiomedicalEngineering_FastFacts_v2.png" alt="" width="313" height="405" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BiomedicalEngineering_FastFacts_v2-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BiomedicalEngineering_FastFacts_v2-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BiomedicalEngineering_FastFacts_v2-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BiomedicalEngineering_FastFacts_v2.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 313px) 100vw, 313px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Agricultural/Biological Engineering and Bioengineering where they account for 5% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative fi eld, Mechanical Engineering, accounts for 4% of all co-authored journal publications in BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<div>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 48.9% of Biomedical Engineering faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 18% of recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering is 80.4% of awards going to male scholars and 19.6% going to female scholars.</p>
<p>Download the full report here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/BiomedicalEngineering_FastFacts_v2.pdf">Biomedical Engineering FastFacts</a></p>
</div>


FastFacts &#8211; Biomedical Engineering

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biochemistry_FastFacts_v2.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-6899 " src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biochemistry_FastFacts_v2.png" alt="" width="263" height="340" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biochemistry_FastFacts_v2-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biochemistry_FastFacts_v2-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biochemistry_FastFacts_v2-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biochemistry_FastFacts_v2.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 263px) 100vw, 263px" /></a>Collaboration with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Chemistry which accounts for 7.8% of all co-authored journal articles in BIOCHEMISTRY. Collaboration with researchers in Molecular Biology follows with 5.6% of all co-authored journal articles. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 65% of Biochemistry faculty have received a national honorific award. Of all professional societies, the American Chemical Society provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 8.6% of all recorded awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Chemical Society is 82.6% of awards going to male scholars and 17.4% going to female scholars.</p>
<p>Download the full report here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Biochemistry_FastFacts_v2.pdf">Biochemistry FastFacts</a></p>


FastFacts &#8211; Biochemistry

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/AnimalScience_FastFacts_v2.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-6893" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/AnimalScience_FastFacts_v2.png" alt="" width="292" height="378" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/AnimalScience_FastFacts_v2-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/AnimalScience_FastFacts_v2-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/AnimalScience_FastFacts_v2-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/AnimalScience_FastFacts_v2.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 292px) 100vw, 292px" /></a>Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Veterinary Medical Sciences where they account for 9.5% of all co-authored journal publications. The next frequent collaborative fi eld, Food Science, accounts for 5.3% of all co-authored journal publications in ANIMAL SCIENCES. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 37.8% of Animal Sciences faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Society of Animal Science provides the most honorific awards for the discipline. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Society of Animal Science is 89.8% of awards going to male scholars and 10.2% going to female scholars.</p>
<p>Download the full report here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/AnimalScience_FastFacts_v2.pdf">Animal Sciences FastFacts</a></p>


FastFacts &#8211; Animal Sciences

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Sociology_FastFacts_3.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-6821" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Sociology_FastFacts_3.png" alt="" width="330" height="427" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Sociology_FastFacts_3-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Sociology_FastFacts_3-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Sociology_FastFacts_3-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Sociology_FastFacts_3.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 330px) 100vw, 330px" /></a>Collaboration with other disciplines frequently involves researchers in Human Development and Family Studies, producing 6.7% of all co-authored SOCIOLOGY journal publications. The next most frequent disciplines are Psychology and Criminal Justice and Criminology which account for 5.6% and 4.3% of all co-authored Sociology journal publications respectively. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in Sociology that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 39.7% of Sociology faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Sociological Society provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 34.3% of the total recorded awards for the discipline. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Sociological Society stands at 55.2% of awards going to male scholars and 44.8% going to female scholars.</p>
<p>Download the full report here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Sociology_FastFacts_3.pdf">Sociology FastFacts</a></p>


FastFacts &#8211; Sociology

<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #ff9900;">UPDATE</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #ff9900;">Proposals are now due on April 20, 2020</span></strong></p>
<p><img class="wp-image-6628 aligncenter" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-300x90.png" alt="AARC - Academic Analytics Research Center" width="167" height="50" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-300x90.png 300w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-768x231.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-1024x308.png 1024w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-1536x462.png 1536w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965-1568x471.png 1568w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC_-e1579541032965.png 1634w" sizes="(max-width: 167px) 100vw, 167px" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Academic Analytics Research Center (AARC) Call for Proposals</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>January 21, 2020</strong></p>
<p>Academic Analytics is pleased to announce the formation of the <strong>Academic Analytics Research Center (AARC)</strong>. AARC is tasked with finding ways the Academic Analytics database can be applied to uncover and disseminate new data and findings on issues of concern to higher education and scholarly research. In addition to publishing original research, AARC also places the Academic Analytics database into the hands of other qualified researchers. From gender disparities in publishing and citations to the lifetime trajectory of faculty research activity in different fields of study, the Academic Analytics database is a rich resource for scholars seeking comprehensive information on research in higher education.</p>
<p>AARC will act as the sole point of contact for any researcher wishing to access the Academic Analytics database and will receive and review all research proposals involving Academic Analytics data. The Academic Analytics Research Center hereby announces a Request for Proposals for a scholarly research project using academic analytics data. The objective of this Request for Proposal is to locate scholars who will provide significant and publishable research projects using the Academic Analytics database, and to support those scholars with data at no cost. The full Request for Proposals can be downloaded here (PDF).</p>
<p>Documents for the Request for Proposals:</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/2020.01.20.Request-for-Proposals-2.pdf">Call for Proposals</a> (PDF)</li>
<li><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2020.01.20.AARC-Research-Request-Form.pdf">AARC Research Request Form</a> (PDF)</li>
</ol>
<p>To contact AARC and for general inquiries: <a href="mailto:aarc@academicanalytics.com">aarc@academicanalytics.com</a> Point of contact for questions concerning a proposal and to whom proposal packages should be e-mailed:</p>
<p>Anthony J. Olejniczak, Ph.D.<br />
Director, Academic Analytics Research Center (AARC)<br />
Co-Founder, Academic Analytics<br />
Email: <a href="mailto:aolejniczak@academicanalytics.com">aolejniczak@academicanalytics.com</a><br />
Office: (614) 264-8098</p>


Academic Analytics Research Center (AARC) &#038; Call for Proposals

<p><span style="color: #000120;"><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/History_FastFacts_3.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-6612 size-medium" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/History_FastFacts_3-232x300.png" alt="" width="232" height="300" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/History_FastFacts_3-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/History_FastFacts_3-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/History_FastFacts_3-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/History_FastFacts_3.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 232px) 100vw, 232px" /></a></span><span style="color: #000120;">Collaboration with other disciplines is most often seen between historians and researchers in International Affairs and Development which accounts for 3.7% of co-authored journal articles in HISTORY. The next two frequent collaborative disciplines are Political Science and Anthropology with 3.2% and 2.4% of co-authored journal articles in History, respectively. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in History that best complement your research and where they are located?</span></p>
<div><span style="color: #000120;">According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 60.8% of all faculty have received an award. Looking at the awards presented by the American Historical Association in the Academic Analytics database, of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, 59.9% have been presented to male scholars; 40.1% have been presented to female scholars.</span></div>
<p>Download the full report here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/History_FastFacts_3.pdf">History FastFacts</a></p>


FastFacts &#8211; History

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/English_FastFacts_4.pdf"><img class="size-medium wp-image-6608 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/English_FastFacts_3-232x300.png" alt="" width="232" height="300" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/English_FastFacts_3-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/English_FastFacts_3-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/English_FastFacts_3-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/English_FastFacts_3.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 232px) 100vw, 232px" /></a><span style="color: #000120;">Collaborations with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Comparative Literature and History, each of which account for 3.7% of co-authored English journal publications. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in English Language and Literature that best complement your research and where they are located? </span></p>
<div><span style="color: #000120;">According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, the National Endowment for the Humanities provides the most awards for the discipline, accounting for 14.2% of the total awards for the discipline. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the NEH is 66.8 % of awards going to male scholars and 33.2% going to female scholars.</span></div>
<p>Download the full report here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/English_FastFacts_4.pdf">English Language and Literature FastFacts</a></p>


FastFacts &#8211; English L&#038;L

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Architecture_FastFacts_3.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-6604 " src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Architecture_FastFacts_3-232x300.png" alt="" width="328" height="424" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Architecture_FastFacts_3-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Architecture_FastFacts_3-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Architecture_FastFacts_3-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Architecture_FastFacts_3.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 328px) 100vw, 328px" /></a>Collaboration with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Civil Engineering which accounts for 10.6% of all co-authored ARCHITECTURE journal publications. The next two most frequent areas of study, Environmental Engineering and Geology/Earth Sciences, account for 10% and 4.1% of all co-authored Architecture journal publications, respectively. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these collaborative fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 32.1% of Architecture faculty have received a national honorific award. The Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 26.7% of all awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture is 73.4% of awards going to male scholars and 26.6% going to female scholars.</p>
<p>Download the full report here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Architecture_FastFacts_3.pdf">Architecture FastFacts</a></p>


FastFacts &#8211; Architecture

<p><strong>&#8220;In Finance Field, Gender Disparities Are Significant—But Shrinking&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Professor of Finance Heather E. Tookes of Yale University recently wrote about her research into the gender gap in the finance discipline, <a href="https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/in-finance-field-gender-disparities-are-significant-but-shrinking">read the story here</a>. Her project incorporated Academic Analytics data from the new Academic Analytics Research Center (AARC).</p>
<p>Read our <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/new-research-on-womens-representation-in-academic-finance-incorporates-academic-analytics-data/">previous post about this research here</a>, and contact us to learn more about how Academic Analytics supports scholars through collaboration and data sharing.</p>


Yale Insights Features Project with Academic Analytics Data

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Physics_FastFacts_4.pdf"><img class="alignleft wp-image-6593 " src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Physics_FastFacts_4-232x300.png" alt="" width="270" height="349" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Physics_FastFacts_4-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Physics_FastFacts_4-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Physics_FastFacts_4-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Physics_FastFacts_4.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 270px) 100vw, 270px" /></a>In PHYSICS, collaboration with other disciplines is most often seen between physicists and researchers in Astronomy and Astrophysics which produces 24% of all co-authored Physics journal publications. The next two frequent collaborative disciplines are Chemistry and Electrical Engineering which account for 2.1% and 1.6% of all co-authored Physics journal publications respectively. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in Physics that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<p>According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 52.5% of all Physics faculty captured by Academic Analytics have received an honorific award. The American Physical Society provides 20.2% of those awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the recipients of awards presented by the American Physical Society recorded in the Academic Analytics database were 88.4% male and 11.6% female.</p>
<p>Download the full report here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Physics_FastFacts_4.pdf">Physics FastFacts</a></p>


FastFacts &#8211; Physics

<p><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Psychology_FastFacts_4.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-6600 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Psychology_FastFacts_4-232x300.png" alt="" width="332" height="429" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Psychology_FastFacts_4-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Psychology_FastFacts_4-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Psychology_FastFacts_4-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Psychology_FastFacts_4.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 332px) 100vw, 332px" /></a>In PSYCHOLOGY, collaboration with other disciplines most often involves researchers in Neurobiology/Neuroscience which accounts for 5.1% of all co-authored Psychology journal publications. The next two most frequent areas of study, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, account for 2.8% and 2.7% of all co-authored Psychology journal publications respectively. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in these collaborative fields that best complement your research and where they are located?</p>
<p><span style="color: #000120;">According to the data captured in the Academic Analytics database, 39.3% of Psychology faculty have received a national honorific award. The American Psychological Association provides the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 35.8% of all awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, the distribution of awards granted by the American Psychological Association is 61.8% of awards going to male scholars and 38.2% going to female scholars.</span></p>
<p>Download the full report here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Psychology_FastFacts_4.pdf">Psychology FastFacts</a></p>


FastFacts &#8211; Psychology

<p><span style="color: #000120;"><a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Chemistry_FastFacts_4-1.pdf"><img class=" wp-image-6598 alignleft" src="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Chemistry_FastFacts_4-232x300.png" alt="" width="328" height="424" srcset="https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Chemistry_FastFacts_4-232x300.png 232w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Chemistry_FastFacts_4-768x994.png 768w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Chemistry_FastFacts_4-791x1024.png 791w, https://aarc.academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Chemistry_FastFacts_4.png 816w" sizes="(max-width: 328px) 100vw, 328px" /></a>Collaboration of CHEMISTRY faculty with other disciplines is most often with Biochemistry faculty which accounts for 7.9% of all co-authored Chemistry publications. The next two most frequent disciplines, Molecular Biology and Physics, account for 3.3% and 3.3% of all co-authored Chemistry publications, respectively. The broad field most like Chemistry is Engineering and its sub-fields, publishing collaborative research 97.6% of the time. Do you know who are the top potential collaborators in Chemistry that best complement your research and where they are located?</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000120;">46.7% of all Chemistry faculty captured by Academic Analytics have received an honorific award. The American Chemical Society presents the most honorific awards for the discipline, accounting for 18.5% of all awards. Of the faculty population for whom we have been able to identify gender, 56.3% of those awards went to male scholars and 43.7% went to female scholars. The next major providers of awards for the discipline are the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.</span></p>
<p>Download the full report here: <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Chemistry_FastFacts_4-1.pdf">Chemistry FastFacts</a></p>


FastFacts &#8211; Chemistry

<p><strong>&#8220;There’s Another Massive Gender Gap in Finance — But There’s Hope&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Check out the <a href="https://bit.ly/2mZvj37">great writeup in <em>Institutional Investor</em></a> about researchers using Academic Analytics data to explore female representation in the academic finance discipline. This truly important work deserves to be discussed and disseminated.</p>
<p>Read our <a href="https://academicanalytics.com/new-research-on-womens-representation-in-academic-finance-incorporates-academic-analytics-data/">previous post about this research here</a>, and contact us to learn more about how Academic Analytics supports scholars through collaboration and data sharing.</p>


Institutional Investor covers reseachers using Academic Analytics

<p>A new preprint <a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438653">available on SSRN</a> examines female representation in the academic finance profession. Authors Mila Getmansky Sherman (Isenberg School of Management at the University of Massachusetts Amherst) and Heather Tookes (professor of finance at the Yale School of Management) relied on Academic Analytics data in their study. Among their findings are that women are less likely to be tenured, and women are paid less than men. Moreover, they report that women publish fewer papers than men, and that women have more female coauthors. We encourage you to read about their research and download their preprint here: <a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438653">https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438653</a>.</p>
<p>If you would like to include Academic Analytics data in your research projects, please <a href="http://www.academicanalytics.com/contact">contact us here</a> to learn more.</p>
<p>Citation: Getmansky Sherman, Mila and Tookes, Heather, Female Representation in the Academic Finance Profession (August 22, 2019). Available at SSRN: <a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438653" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://ssrn.com/abstract=3438653</a> or <a class="textlink" href="https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3438653" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3438653 </a></p>


Blog